Answer:
Explination:
Egypt–Mexico relations refers to the diplomatic relations between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the United Mexican States. Both nations are members of the Group of 15, Group of 24 and the United Nations.
During the Second French intervention in Mexico, Mohamed Sa'id Pasha of Egypt agreed to send Emperor Napoleon III and Auxiliary Battalion of 447 Egyptian-Sudanese soldiers (mostly Sudanese enlisted men with Egyptian officers) to Mexico. At the time, it was thought that soldiers from Africa would "adapt" better to the heat in Mexico than the French. In 1867 the surviving 326 soldiers were shipped to France before returning to Egypt.
In 1905, Mexico opened a consulate in the port city of Alexandria to assist Mexican ships which stopped in the city before or after traveling through the Suez Canal. In 1922, Egypt obtained independence from the United Kingdom and diplomatic relations between Egypt and Mexico were established on 31 March 1958.
In 1960 both nations opened a resident embassy in each other's capitals, respectively. Since then, relations between both nations have mostly been based on mutual respect and cooperation on international issues at the United Nations. In 1975, Mexican President Luis Echeverría paid an official visit to Egypt and in 1981, President José López Portillo also visited Egypt.
In September 2015 a group of 14 Mexican tourists were mistakenly attacked by Egyptian Security Forces while they were on holiday in Egypt's Western Desert. Egyptian officials said security forces mistook the tourists for terrorists. During the attack, eight Mexican nationals were killed and six were injured. Mexico's government condemned the incident, calling for an exhaustive investigation of the incident. Mexico's Foreign Minister, Claudia Ruiz Massieu, stated that the Mexican government would not sever diplomatic relations with Egypt over the incident.
Both countries regularly provide cultural exhibitions in each other's countries and in 1996, both nations established the Egyptian-Mexican Association for Egyptology. In 2018, both nations celebrated 60 years of diplomatic relations.
PLEASE THANK, RATE AND FOLLOW ME,
AND PLEASE MARK ME AS "BRAINLIEST" ANSWER
HOPE IT HELPS YOU
hurry
People in the Middle East began to join together and find unity based on religion, values, and culture as an effect of European partitioning. This is known as __________.
A.
imperialism
B.
nationalism
C.
Islamism
D.
socialism
Answer:
A
Hope its helps and is correct :)
Answer:
Option A.
Explanation:
People in the Middle East began to join together and find unity based on religion, values, and culture as an effect of European partitioning. This is known as Imperialism.
Congress passes a law that says everyone must worship the sunset. Ana is
arrested for refusing to participate.
Does this affect the bill of rights being violated ?
Answer: Yes this affects the bill of rights
Explanation:
The first amendment includes; speech, assembly, press, religion, and petition. Passing a law forcing everyone to worship the sunset, is a direct violation of the first amendment (in the bill of rights)
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
congress.gov says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Communication is
a) systemic
b) none of the above
c) a process
d) all of the above
e) symbolic
Answer:
e is the correct answer to this question
56:25
Which of the following traditions is usually not a part of Hindu rituals?
A. worshiping at shrines
B. discussing the Eightfold Path
C. chanting and reciting scriptures
D. praying and making offerings to gods
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
ОООО
C
D
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Answer:
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Explanation:
Read the sentence and determine the type of imagery that is used.
The woods were empty as far as he could tell, not so much as a whisper, and yet he couldn't shake the feeling he wasn't alone.
Answer:
visual imagery
Explanation:
What is a peasant? Would you want to be peasant why or why not?
Answer:
A peasant is a pre-industrial agricultural laborer or a farmer with limited land-ownership, especially one living in the Middle Ages under feudalism and paying rent, tax, fees, or services to a landlord. In Europe, three classes of peasants existed: slave, serf, and free tenant...and no I wouldn't like to be a peasant :c
The ability to choose to do what is morally right or what is morally wrong is known as
A. Original Sin
B. temptation
C. free will
D. Grace
Answer:
Free will
Explanation:
Southern governments passed laws called Black Codes that
granted freedom to African Americans.
supplied land to African Americans.
banned slavery in all Southern states.
restricted the rights of African Americans.
Answer:
granted freedom to African Americans
Explanation:
Black codes were restrictive laws designed to limit the freedom of African Americans and ensure their availability as a cheap labor force after slavery was abolished during the Civil War.
What was James F. Robinsons impact on KY in the Civil War?
Answer:
During Robinson's tenure, the Confederacy made its major advance into the Commonwealth. In an attempt to protect the citizens of the Commonwealth, Robinson raised taxes in an effort to revive Kentucky's state militia. He was also concerned with the effect the war had on public education in the state
Explanation:
i will give brainlyest!!!!!!! Why did Quanah Parker and his fighters lose so many men to so few hunters in the attack on Adobe Walls?
Answer:
In order to stem the onslaught of Comanche attacks on settlers and travelers, the U.S. government assigned the Indians to reservations in 1867. Quanah and his band, however, refused to cooperate and continued their raids.
1. Explain what led to the French and Indian War, explain key events during the conflict, and explain how the war was resolved. i need help plz
Answer:
Events Leading to the French and Indian War. The French and Indian War is part of an often-forgotten period in American history.It took place from 1754 to 1763—between the time the first European settlers arrived in North America and the time when some of their descendants fought for independence in the American Revolution (1775- 83). The French and Indian War
Why would governments most likely restrict or interfere with elections?
to remain in power
to prevent voter fraud
to reduce corruption
to stop election violence
Answer:
I think government do so,
to remain in power
hope it helps.
Governments would most likely restrict or interfere with elections to remain in power. The correct option is A.
What part of government is responsible for elections?The California Secretary of State oversees elections for the biggest state in the union and examines and certifies all voting apparatus for security, reliability, accuracy, and accessibility to guarantee that every vote is counted exactly as it was cast.
Governments may try to manipulate the electoral process in various ways, such as by suppressing opposition parties, limiting access to the media, gerrymandering electoral districts, and manipulating voter registration and ballot counting. These actions can undermine the integrity of the electoral process and create an unfair advantage for the ruling party or individual.
While governments may claim to be acting to prevent voter fraud or reduce corruption, such claims may often be used as a pretext for suppressing opposition and maintaining power. Governments may also use force or violence to stop election violence, but this is typically done to restore order and ensure that the electoral process proceeds fairly and safely.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about elections here:
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ3
How did the Proclamation of 1763 contribute to the outbreak of the American Revolution?
A) It imposed a series of new taxes on colonial merchants
B) It forced colonists to accept British and Hessian troops into their homes
C) It angered colonists who saw it as an unjustified intrusion into their affairs
D) It forced colonists to relocate west of the Appalachian Mountains
D..hope this answer helps out
How many apples did pete pick at the store?
Answer:
5
Explanation:
Which of the following evidence would best support the author's claims in the
previous question? *
Answer:
whats the previous question? : /
The caste system is a great evil in Indian history and provides a vivid example of how religion can justify the oppression and exploitation of people. Can you think of any parallels in other religions? Do you think caste discrimination is similar to discrimination on the basis of race and social class in the U.S.? Are there important differences?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
just like in India where people were treated terribly based of of their rank in the cast, much of American discrimination was like that too. Anglo Americans justified their actions with the bible and the catholic church . they used scriptures that stated "slave most obey their master" to justify the killing and slavery of African Americans and Native Americans . although the religions it self isnt evil, the interpretations are
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
In every government, there are three sorts of power the legislative, the executive (and what) we may call the judiciary power... When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same
person there can be no liberty because fears may arise that the same monarch... should enact tyrannical laws and execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty if the judiciary not be
separated from the legislative and executive
How did these ideas influence the Founding Fathers of the United States?
a. They decided to establish a constitutional monarchy.
b. They decided to separate the powers of government into three branches.
c. They decided each branch of government should be able to check the other branches.
d. They decided to establish a representative form of government
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Answer:
I think it's c It says that this needs to be 20 characters long so
What caused Britan to begin considering India's desire for independance?
Gandhi's death
The end of WW1
The salt March
Economic Collapse
Answer:
2
Explanation:
Based on historical perspective, the thing that caused Britain to begin considering India's desire for independence is "The end of WW1."
Impact of World War IFollowing the end of world war I in 1918, there were various lasting effects on the people, particularly the significant participating countries.
One of the significant political impacts of World War I was the rise of independence movements among many nations, including India.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option B. "The end of WW1."
Learn more about the impacts of world war I here: https://brainly.com/question/750915
What were a couple reasons the Articles of Confederation were not working for the USA?
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation were not working largely because they did not grant enough power to the federal government. First of all, they were too weak to enforce laws, regulate trade routes, and especially levy taxes, which was very important coming out of the Revolutionary War with so much debt. All 13 states voted to redraft and edit the Articles, but instead of changing it, they started over with the Constitution.
An accomplishment of the Lewis and Clark expedition was that it
Answer:
Lewis and Clark made significant additions to the zoological and botanical knowledge of the continent, providing the first scientific descriptions of many new species of animals, including the grizzly bear, prairie dog, pronghorn antelope, and mountain goat.
Explanation:
what was one source of conflict between the northern and southern tibes of the Israelites?
when Solomon's successor, Rehoboam, dealt tactlessly with economic complaints of the northern tribes, in about 930 BCE (there are differences of opinion as to the actual year:} ) the Kingdom of Israel and Judah split into two kingdoms: the northern Kingdom of Israel, which included the cities of Shechem and Samaria^^
after the death of King Solomon (sometime around 930 B.C.) the kingdom split into a northern kingdom, which retained the name Israel and a southern kingdom called Judah, so named after the tribe of Judah that dominated the kingdom. ......The last war they engaged in destroyed Israel but left Judah intact:)
Uh also the current nation of Israel is still largely made up of the original southern kingdom of Judah, while the tribes of the northern kingdom remain scattered: >
em... here are some random names :D Nine landed tribes formed the Northern Kingdom: the tribes of Reuben, Issachar, Zebulun, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Ephraim, and Manasseh
HELP QUICK Why do you think immigration spiked during 1901-1910?
What is one difference and one similarly between Southern, Middle, and New England?
Answer:
Similar to New England colonies, the Middle colonies also flourished in trade of major items like iron and furs. The middles colonies had rich farmland and a moderate climate. This made it a more suitable place to grow grain and livestock than New England. The Southern colonies had fertile farmlands which contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo.
The colonies were alike in that they all had close ties to England. They were mainly populated by English-speaking people. The Middle colonies and New England had some slaves, while the southern colonies had africans as most of the population.
Explanation:
Followers of Jainism believe that the highest rule of behavior is to harm no living thing. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
true
Explanation: you can
in the reservation system American Indian tribes were confined to assigned land with
Answer:
a. defined borders
Explanation:
Some things you might not have known about ISIS.
Answer:
Some things you might not have known about ISIS is that they not only attack other countries, but do it for the money like kidnapping children, making thousands of minors who are girls and young women as their slaves, smuggling, and anything related to shoplifting which are against the law.
Why was the Ordinance of Nullification passed in 1832?
O The national government passed it to prevent problems between the states.
O The state of Virginia passed it in opposition of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
O The state of South Carolina passed it in opposition to the Tariff of 1828
O The state of Kentucky passed it to support of the Missouri Compromise.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Why was the Ordinance of Nullification passed in 1832?
The national government passed it to prevent problems between the states.
The state of Virginia passed it in opposition of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
✔ The state of South Carolina passed it in opposition to the Tariff of 1828.
The state of Kentucky passed it to support of the Missouri Compromise.
The Ordinance of Nullification was passed in 1832 because the state of South Carolina passed it in opposition to the Tariff of 1828. The correct option is C.
What was the result of the South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification?South Carolina's Ordinance of Nullification declared the Tariffs of 1829 and 1832 unconstitutional and thus null and void. It was founded on Vice President John C. Calhoun's doctrine of nullification. This doctrine served as the foundation for Confederate political ideology.
South Carolina passed the Ordinance of Nullification in November 1832, declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state. In December, President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation asserting the federal government's supremacy.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about the Ordinance of Nullification here:
https://brainly.com/question/4404190
#SPJ6
Select the correct answer.
What is the author's voice in the text, based on the word choices she makes?
A formal and inspirational
B. casual and relaxed
C. scornful and sarcastic
D. optimistic and cheerful
The author's voice in the text, based on the word choices she makes, scornful and sarcastic. Thus, option C is correct.
What is the scornful and sarcastic?Sarcasm is the use of words that signify the opposite of what you really want to express, usually to insult someone, demonstrate displeasure, or just to be humorous. Scornful means to feel or show disdain or ridicule.
More significantly, numerous unemployed persons confront the bleak prospect of surviving. Many people are unemployed, and many more are working for minimal pay. Only a naïve optimist could dismiss the current grim reality. We cannot change the workforce merely by talking about it. We must rise to the occasion and effect genuine change.
The author's voice throughout the book is disdainful and sardonic, depending on the word choices she uses. As a result, option C is correct.
Learn more about sarcastic here:
https://brainly.com/question/27490742
#SPJ5
Your question was incomplete, probably the complete question was.....
More importantly, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence. A large number lack work, and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist could deny the dark realities of the moment. We cannot transform the workforce simply with talk. We must rise to this challenging occasion and make true change.
"Father of the Federalist Papers" for ratification of the U.S. Constitution
After the Constitutional Convention, there were numerous groups that were determined
that the proposed new constitution should not be successfully ratified by the states. Since the
proceedings were in secret, some in opposition felt free to create a misrepresentation of what
actually occurred. They were quite successful in turning large numbers of people against the
proposed constitution. Alexander Hamilton decided to produce a number of printed essays
that would explain the need for such a new constitution.
These essays are now referred to as the "Federalist Papers". The actual title was "The
Federalist: A Collection of Essays Written in Favor of the New Constitution". He obtained two
other authors (James Madison & John Jay) to assist in writing sections of the outline. Almost
every week a new essay would be published. These essays were invaluable in educating the
public of the true purpose and value of the new constitution.
They also helped facilitate discussion during the state ratification conventions. Virginia
went in to their state convention with delegates tied at 84-84. The end result of the convention
was Virginia's ratification - the final vote was 89 for and 79 against. Delegates in New York,
where Hamilton led in support of the constitution, came into the state ratification convention
with 46 against ratification and only 19 for ratification. After six weeks, and against all odds,
New York ratified the U.S. Constitution on July 26, 1788 with a vote of 30 for ratification and 27
against
What is the main idea of this passage?
The main idea of this passage is to tell you about how the federalist papers let to the ratification of the constitution.The passage said,Alexander Hamilton decided to produce a number of printed essays that would explain the need for such a new constitution.These essays are now referred to as the "Federalist Papers".This shows that the main idea is to tell you about the ratification of the constitution because the federalist papers played a part in the constitution. This also shows that Hamilton wrote this to explain a need for a new constitution.The passage said,"These essays were invaluable in educating the public of the true purpose and value of the new constitution....After six weeks, and against all odds, New York ratified the U.S. Constitution" This shows that the essays educated people about the need for the constitution to be ratified. This also shows that it made new york want to ratify the constitution so the constitution was ratified. To summarize, the main idea of this passage is to explain/tell you how the federalist papers led to the ratification of the constitution.
After a child is accidentally injured from a gun, the city council proclaims that
guns are dangerous and will not be allowed in peoples' homes. (Is the Bill of
Rights being violated?)
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Second Amendment, one of the ten amendments to the Constitution comprising the Bill of Rights, states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is the right to bear arms.
