In your lesson you learned how some researchers reach their number when talking about the Holocaust. Do you think their methods are sound? If so, use their numbers for your calculations.

What does this mean? I don't exactly what these directions mean. Help?

Note that the idea of communism was very popular in Russia because: "Russian peasants and workers had been mistreated by czars and wanted a change." (Option B)

By way of definition, note that Communism is a political and economic system in which the government owns and controls the means of production and distribution. Communism's objective is to establish a classless society in which all property and money are divided equally among the people.

Thus, it is correct to state that Communism was popular in Russia because it promised radical transformation and the creation of a more fair society. For many Russian peasants and workers, communism provided a path out of the terrible and exploitative conditions they had faced during the czars' rule.

Learn more about communism:
https://brainly.com/question/14665538
#SPJ1

Answer:

What is the Cultural?  you need to add more info. but ill do what I can

Explanation:

relating to the ideas, customs, and social behavior of a society.

"the cultural diversity of the world's peoples"

Cultural means relating to a particular society and its ideas, customs, and art. ... a deep sense of personal honor which was part of his cultural heritage.

Culture can be defined as all the ways of life including arts, beliefs, and institutions of a population that are passed down from generation to generation. Culture has been called "the way of life for an entire society." As such, it includes codes of manners, dress, language, religion, rituals, art

During World War II, many women entered the labor field to aid the war effort. This was a dramatic shift in society attitudes regarding women and labor, with a variety of favorable consequences.

Note that during the War:

After the war:

It is correct to state that the aftermath of World War I, the emergence of authoritarian governments in Europe, and the failure of appeasement all contributed to the outbreak of World War II.

The Treaty of Versailles, which brought World War I to a close, placed heavy sanctions on Germany, leaving many Germans humiliated and unhappy. The advent of dictators such as Adolf Hitler in Germany and Benito Mussolini in Italy, as well as their aggressive foreign policies, contributed to the escalation of tensions and the beginning of the war.

Learn more about WWII:
https://brainly.com/question/27254529
#SPJ1

The authors of the Articles of Confederation stopped writing the initial draft because they faced a number of challenges in their efforts to create a unified national government for the newly-independent United States.

One of the main challenges was the conflicting interests and priorities of the various states. Some states were more concerned with maintaining their autonomy and power, while others were more focused on creating a strong central government that could enforce laws and protect the country's interests.

Another challenge was the fear of central authority that had been ingrained in the American people due to their experience with British rule. This made it difficult for the authors of the Articles of Confederation to create a government that was strong enough to enforce laws and protect national interests, yet still limited enough to prevent abuse of power.

Conclusively, despite these challenges, the authors of the Articles of Confederation eventually succeeded in creating a workable national government, but it was recognized as having significant weaknesses, particularly with regards to its inability to raise revenue and regulate commerce. This eventually led to the drafting of a new Constitution and the creation of the present-day United States government.

Learn more about Articles of Confederation from

https://brainly.com/question/7743965

#SPJ1

Answer:

The United States Constitution was written with the intention of protecting citizens from tyranny. It was a document that was designed to limit the power of the government and ensure that the rights of the people were respected. The Constitution was written in such a way that it provided a framework for the government and the laws that it passed. In order to guard against tyranny, the Constitution provided for a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government.

The first way in which the Constitution guarded against tyranny was by separating the powers of the government into three separate branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This separation of powers ensured that no one branch of the government had too much power and that each branch was able to check the power of the other two. This system allowed for a system of checks and balances and ensured that the government could not become too powerful.

The second way in which the Constitution guarded against tyranny was by providing for a system of federalism. This system of federalism provided for a strong central government that was able to pass laws and regulations, but also allowed for the states to have their own laws and regulations. This system of federalism ensured that the power of the government was limited and that the states were able to have a say in the laws and regulations that were passed.

The third way in which the Constitution guarded against tyranny was by providing for a system of individual rights. These rights were enshrined in the Bill of Rights and provided citizens with protection from the government. These rights included the right to free speech, the right to a fair trial, the right to bear arms, and the right to privacy. These rights ensured that the government could not infringe upon the rights of its citizens and that the citizens had a way to protect themselves from the government.

The Constitution of the United States was written with the intention of protecting citizens from tyranny. It provided for a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, a system of federalism, and a system of individual rights. These systems ensured that the government could not become too powerful and that the rights of the citizens were respected. By providing these safeguards, the Constitution was able to guard against tyranny and ensure that the citizens of the United States were protected from oppression.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution guards against tyranny through a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government. It also includes the Bill of Rights, which limits governmental power and guarantees individual freedoms. These mechanisms aim to distribute power equally and prevent one entity from gaining too much control.

The U.S. Constitution guards against tyranny through a system of checks and balances and separation of powers. The three branches of government - the legislative, executive, and judicial - each have distinct duties and powers to prevent one from having too much power. For example, the legislative branch (Congress) makes laws, but those laws can be vetoed by the executive (President). However, Congress can override that veto with a two-thirds vote. Additionally, the judicial branch (Supreme Court) can declare laws made by Congress or actions by the President unconstitutional.

Another important measure against tyranny in the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. These first ten amendments to the Constitution protect the rights of individual citizens and limit the power of the federal government. For example, the First Amendment guarantees freedoms of speech, religion, and the press, while the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.

https://brainly.com/question/32810600

#SPJ6

The United States has a long history of promoting democracy and human rights around the world, including in the Middle East. However, in recent years, some critics have argued that the U.S. has been less active in its efforts to promote democracy in the region.

There are a number of reasons for this perceived shift. One is the changing global landscape and the U.S. priorities shifting on that. As the US focus shifted to competing with Russia and China, the importance of promoting democracy abroad has diminished.

Another reason is that the U.S. has become increasingly involved in the fight against terrorism, which has led to a focus on security and stability over democracy promotion in some countries in the Middle East. As a result, some have argued that the U.S. has been more willing to overlook human rights abuses and authoritarian practices in countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt in order to maintain strategic partnerships and cooperation in the fight against terrorism.

Additionally, the U.S foreign policy has changed under different administration, some may be more focused on democracy promotion, some less. Overall, it is complex issue and there are multiple factors at play.

Learn more about democracy here: brainly.com/question/3710021

#SPJ4

By giving free land to settlers who came to the Old Dominion the head right system lead to the growth of Jamestown. Thus, option (b) is correct.

An area of the earth's surface is referred to as “land” in this context. This region of the planet is particular. As a forest, mineral, animal, body, and soil, among other things, the land is a part of the ecosystem. No person can live without land.

There were Jamestown in the Old Dominion, USA was the first permanent base, its growth was critical. This was made feasible by the headright system, which encouraged Europeans to cross the land and join this society.

As a result, the free land to settlers as the right to the growth system. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on land, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27588497

#SPJ1

Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.

A. By paying people high prices for the crops they produced

B. By giving free land to settlers who came to Virginia

C. By giving people free seeds and farm equipment

D. By paying for people's passages to America

FDR believed that the government should invest in people, and that would put into motion a cause/effect relationship that would eventually lead back to economic stability for the nation. Therefore, the correct answer option is: A. people.

The New Deal can be defined as a collection of government reform social programs that were established in the United States of America by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt between 1933 and 1939 (Great Depression), in order to achieve the following:

This ultimately implies that, the Great Depression/New Deal changed Americans' expectations about the government's role during economic crisis because they thought the government should intervene.

Consequently, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt believed that the government should invest in the American people in order to create economic stability for the United States of America.

Read more on New Deal here: https://brainly.com/question/24306267

#SPJ1

GDP is determined by average income earned per person in a particular region in a particular year. Jamaica's GDP per capita is around $4800.00. Therefore, Jamaica's standard of living is very low in comparison.

GDP growth is primarily affected by labor productivity and the total working hours of a country's workforce. (GDP can be thought of as labor productivity multiplied by the size of the workforce). Labor productivity can be understood as the yield earned by one hour of labor in the country.

GDP can be expressed as an equation that sums up all its components: A country's level of consumption, investment, government spending on goods and services, and profit differentials between imports and exports.

GDP does not measure welfare or human well-being. GDP may not be a solid basis for forecasting economic growth in times of high uncertainty. GDP took a long time to reflect changes in the world because international accounting standards are slow to change and require international consensus.

To learn more about GDP visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30109402

#SPJ1

The conquistador's most advantages were horses, steel armor, gunpowder, and resistance to their own diseases. Horses were unknown in America and no war animals were used by native populations for fighting and transportation.

The most notable achievement of Spain under the Hapsburgs was its ability to retain control over its vast territories spread around the world. No other state in the 16th and 17th centuries was faced with such an enormous administration problem. Spain had to explore, colonize and govern a new world.

Spain's rise to be a European and global power began with the marriage(1469) of queen Isabel of Castile(1474-1504) and king Ferdinand of Aragon (1479-1516), whose realm included Argon proper, Valencia, and Catalonia.

Spain led European global exploration and colonial expansion in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Trade flourished across the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Toppling the Aztec and Inca civilization, Spain laid claim to vast territories in North and South America.

In 1492- The Christian Kingdoms of Castile and Aragon conquer the Emirate of Granada, ending nearly 800 years of Muslim rule in the south and founding modern Spain as a united state.

To learn more about the Spanish kingdom, please refer to the links below:

https://brainly.com/question/7693669

I do think the American cities would not have grown as large as they did without the Industrial Revolution because the revolution brought about new way of things which would not be possible without the emergence in Britain

Cities in the United States grew at a rapid rate between 1880 and 1900, especially by about 15 million people in the two decades preceding 1900, owing primarily to industrial expansion. 

Many of those who contributed to city population growth were immigrants from all over the world. During this time, a steady stream of people from rural America migrated to the cities. Between 1880 and 1890, nearly 40% of townships in the United States lost population due to migration.

Read more about Industrial Revolution

brainly.com/question/14240244

#SPJ1

The publication of John C. Calhoun's pamphlet proposing nullification by South Carolina was an act of defiance against the federal government.

Calhoun argued that states had greater power than they currently exercised in relationship to the federal government, and that states should have the right to nullify any laws that were seen as unconstitutional or harmful to the interests of the state. This reflected the larger sectional differences in the United States, as Calhoun's views were in opposition to those of President Jackson and other federalists who believed in a strong central government.

Learn more about federal government at: https://brainly.com/question/860014

#SPJ4

The city which was established by Sargon the Great - Akkad the city which was taken by the Sumerians in 2100 BC - Ur grandson of Sargon the Great - Naram-Sin daughter of Sargon the Great - Enheduanna

One of the earliest major empire builders in history, Sargon, also known as Sargon of Akkad, was an ancient Mesopotamian king who ruled from around 2334 to 2279 bce. He subjugated all of southern Mesopotamia as well as portions of Syria, Anatolia, and Elam (western Iran). He is credited with founding the first Semitic monarchy in the area and the Mesopotamian military heritage. Not from papers recorded during his lifetime, but rather from the legends and stories that followed his fame across 2,000 years of cuneiform Mesopotamian history. Because the capital city of Agade (Akkad), which he erected, has never been found and excavated, the paucity of historical records can be explained.

According to a folktale, Sargon was a self-made man from poor beginnings. A gardener raised him in his chosen profession after discovering him as a newborn floating in a basket on the river. His mother is rumored to have been a priestess at a village on the middle Euphrates; his father is unknown; his own name during his boyhood is likewise unknown. As a result, he rose without the aid of powerful connections and eventually held the position of cupbearer to the monarch of Kish, a city in the north of the ancient Sumerian homeland.

To know more about Sargon the Great, visit:

brainly.com/question/8062170

#SPJ1

Euhemerism is an approach to the interpretation of mythology in which mythological accounts are presumed to have originated from real historical events or personages. [TRUE]

Euhemerism is an approach to the interpretation of mythology in which mythological stories are ascribed to real historical events or figures. Euhemerism presupposes that historical records become myths because they are exaggerated in retelling, collecting elaborations and changes that reflect the culture's customs. Named for the Greek mythological Euhemerus, who lived in the late 4th century BC. In more recent mythical literature, such as Bulfinch mythology, euhemerism is called the "historical theory" of mythology.

Euhemerus was not the first to try to rationalize mythology in historical terms: a euhemeristic view is found in earlier writings including those of the Sanchuniathon, Xenophanes, Herodotus, Hecataeus of Abdera and Ephorus. However, Euhemerus' lasting influence on later thinkers such as the classical poet Ennius (b. 239 BC) and the modern writer Antoine Banier (b. 1673 AD) identify him as the traditional founder of this school of thought.

Socrates illustrates a euhemeristic approach to the myth of Boreas kidnapping Orithyia. He shows how the story of Boreas, the north wind, can be rationalized: Orithyia is pushed off a rock cliff through Boreas' likeness of a natural gust of wind, who accepts Orithyia as a historical figure. But here he also implies that this is tantamount to rejecting myths. Socrates, although holding some euheristic views, ridiculed the concept that all myths can be rationalized, noting that mythical creatures of "absurd forms" such as Centaurs and Chimeras cannot be easily explained.

Learn more about The mythological works at https://brainly.com/question/17602689.

#SPJ4

Answer:

Gosh,, that's alot... that's on you btw, good luck

Answer:

As some people reply and don't provide answers, here you go hope this helps!

Explanation:

There were several political, economic, and social motivations for European imperialism during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

One political motivation was the desire to spread Western values and ideas, such as democracy and capitalism, to other parts of the world. European powers believed that they had a moral obligation to "civilize" and "modernize" non-Western societies. This belief was often justified using the ideology of Social Darwinism, which argued that some races were inherently superior to others and therefore had the right to dominate them.

One economic motivation for European imperialism was the desire to access new markets and sources of raw materials. European powers established colonies in Africa, Asia, and the Americas in order to exploit the natural resources and labor of these regions. This allowed them to fuel their growing industries and expand their economic influence.

One social motivation for European imperialism was the belief in cultural superiority. Many Europeans believed that their culture, religion, and way of life were superior to those of other societies, and that it was their duty to spread these values to the "uncivilized" parts of the world. This belief was often used to justify acts of aggression and exploitation, as Europeans believed they were bringing "progress" and "civilization" to the colonized peoples.

AS FOR THE SECOND, ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED

There were several causes of World War I. Some of the main causes include:

Nationalism: Many European countries were characterized by intense nationalism, or a strong sense of pride and loyalty to one's nation. This nationalism often led to militarism, as countries competed to build larger and more powerful militaries in order to assert their dominance.

Alliances: In the years leading up to World War I, many European countries formed alliances with one another in order to strengthen their military and political power. These alliances often led to a complex web of political obligations, as countries were obligated to come to the aid of their allies if they were attacked.

Imperialism: European powers were competing to expand their empires and control overseas territories, which often led to conflicts of interest and tensions between countries.

Militarism: Many European countries were engaged in an arms race, competing to build the largest and most powerful militaries. This militarism contributed to an atmosphere of distrust and hostility between nations.

Assassination of Archduke Ferdinand: The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in 1914 was a major trigger for World War I. The assassination set off a chain of events that led to the declaration of war.

Two of these causes that played a particularly significant role in the outbreak of World War I are nationalism and imperialism.

Nationalism was a major cause of World War I because it led to an intense sense of loyalty and pride in one's country, which often led to militarism and the desire to assert one's nation's dominance. This nationalism also fueled the desire for expansion and conquest, as countries sought to spread their ideology and culture to other parts of the world.

Imperialism was another major cause of World War I because it led to competition and tensions between European powers as they

Based on this petition, the statement that best describes the authors’ point of view is that the Enslaved people have the same right to freedom as the colonists who are declaring their ndependence from Britain.

As the American Revolution began, Hall joined the cause and argued that blacks should be allowed to fight alongside the other colonists for American independence.

He organized a number of petitions to the Massachusetts legislature urging the abolition of slavery and the advancement of African American civil rights.

Missing options "(1) Enslaved people have the same right to freedom as the colonists who are declaring their independence from Britain. (2) The American colonists should ask King George for their independence. (3) By fighting for the Revolutionary army, enslaved people have earned their freedom. (4) The authors of the petition wish to remain united with Great Britain

Read more about American Revolution

brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ1

Option A, Jackson did not increase or use federal executive authority under the American System.

Jackson also broadened the purview of presidential power in other ways. Members of his cabinet who refused to carry out his orders were expelled under his control. He had federal executive four head of state including five cabinets of the Treasury throughout his two stints in office. Jackson established the foundation for democracy, eliminated the national debt, won new territories for the American System , improved federal executive with other countries worldwide, and created a new currency. Jackson vetoed the measure when federal executive Congress extended the bank's charter. He sent the following message to the congress after exercising his veto. Jackson made a contentious choice.

Learn more about Jackson here:

https://brainly.com/question/15647756

#SPJ4

The American System was NOT an example of Jackson expanding or exercising federal executive power

Jackson additionally widened the domain of official power in alternate ways. Individuals from his bureau who would not complete his orders were removed and influenced quite a bit. He had government leaders and four heads of state including five cupboards of the Depository all throughout his two spells in office. Jackson laid out the establishment of a majority rules government, wiped out the public obligation, won new domains for the American Framework, worked on bureaucratic leadership with different nations around the world, and made another cash. Jackson rejected the action when the government chief Congress broadened the bank's contract. He sent the accompanying message to congress after practicing his rejection. Jackson went with a combative decision.

Learn more about federal executive power:

https://brainly.com/question/946144

#SPJ4

Answer:

protestant teachers

Explanation:

Answer: D. German Quakers

Explanation:

Don’t listen to the person who said A, I just took the test and D is correct, have a good day :D

After the First Sino-Japanese War's catastrophic defeat and the Eight-Nation Alliance's invasion and plunder of Beijing, modern Chinese nationalism began to take shape in the late Qing era (1636–1912).

What was the First Sino-Japanese War?

The First Sino-Japanese War was a struggle between China and Japan in 1894–1895 that saw the rise of Japan as a significant world power and exposed the frailty of the Chinese empire. The two nations' desire for domination in Korea led to the start of the war. Korea had long been China's most significant client state, but Japan became interested in Korea because to its strategic location next to the Japanese islands and its abundant coal and iron resources. Japan, which had started to use Western technology, compelled Korea in 1875 to declare its independence from China in the world and open its borders to global trade, especially Japanese trade.

Know more about Alliance's invasion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9260343

SPJ1

1) As a result, the Slave Trade Compromise was enacted, which granted the federal government considerable control over commerce while stating that Congress could not outlaw the slave trade for 20 years until 1808, but could impose a fee on those imported and used as slaves.

2) The growth of the South's 'Cotton Kingdom' intensified the argument over slavery and state rights, eventually culminating to the Missouri Crisis and the Civil War.

3) Note that Poverty, illiteracy, and moral degradation were among the societal concerns that prompted the Second Great Awakening, a Christian reform movement in early 18th-century America. This resulted in the emergence of new religious groups as well as a renewed emphasis on religious revival and piety, both of which had a considerable influence on society, including the abolition and temperance movements.

It is a historical fact that the Slave Trade Compromise's basic principle was that freshly enslaved Africans could not be brought into the United States after 1808.

This solution was intended to placate southern farmers who wished to enslave people while also dealing a significant blow to the slave trade.

Learn more about the slave trade compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/7490413
#SPJ1

Additionally, according to Jefferson, the Constitution does not grant the federal government the authority to create a bank. Hamilton also disagreed with this statement.

Hamilton intended the government to establish bank branches in significant cities, a common currency, and a location for the federal government to deposit or borrow money when necessary. He based his plans on Great Britain's national bank. Thomas Jefferson thought it was unconstitutional for there to be a national bank.

Thomas Jefferson was concerned that a national bank would establish a financial monopoly that may harm state banks and implement policies that benefited financiers and merchants,  typically were creditors, over plantation owners and small-scale farmers, who typically were debtors.

To know more about  Jefferson's condemning Hamilton visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/20631796

#SPJ1

The ancient Egyptian trade routes. Nile River, a body of water, connected trade between Egypt and Nubia.

What is Egypt?

The largest Arab nation is Egypt, which is situated in Africa's northeast. In contemporary Middle Eastern affairs, Egypt has assumed a significant role. The Egypt citizen is called the Egyptians. The Egyptians were of Egyptian descent, and their native language was Asian.

The Nile River was portrayed on the map as a purple line. The Nile was a famous river. In Eastern Africa, the Nile River flows approximately north to south. The Nile River is the third tallest, running 4,132 kilometers (6,600 kilometers). The Nile River shifted the crop calendar in Ancient Egypt. Crops were planted while the Nile River was at its maximum height.

As a result, the Nile River was the main medium of the trade.

Learn more about Egypt, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9626101

#SPJ1

Wagner's the ring of nibelungs is a cycle of four music dramas that took the composer nearly 25 years to complete and takes more than 15 hours to perform. This statement is TRUE.

Wagner's The Ring of Nibelung (German: Der Ring des Nibelungen) is a cycle of four music dramas composed by Richard Wagner. Those cycles are: (1) Das Rheingold (the Rhinegold), (2) Die Walküre (the Valkyrie), (3) Siegfried, and (4) Götterdämmerung. Richard Wagner is a German composer who composed The Ring of the Nibelung between 1848 and 1874 (26 years). So, it is true that the cycle took the composer nearly 25 years to complete. This cycle's performance lasts around 18 hours. So, the statement is true, it takes more than 15 hours to perform.

The Ring opera has nearly 90 members. The instrument used is a modified horn called the Wagner tuba. The other instruments are the Wagner bell, Stierhorn, harps, anvils, contrabass trombone, and bass trumpet.

Here to learn more about The Ring of the Nibelung's performance last:

https://brainly.com/question/9844358

#SPJ4

It's true (option a), in March 1981, a German mother named Marianne Bachmeier, entered the court in Lübeck with a Beretta M1934 and fired 7 bullets at Klaus Grabowski seven times, accused of insulting and killing Anna Bachmeier, her seven-year-old daughter.

The woman smuggled a weapon into court, passed the security controls and with her hands in the pockets of her white raincoat, she stood behind the defendant, and without the guards being able to prevent her, she activated the weapon.

The woman, after being arrested, only regretted not having shot him from the front.

Learn more about the use of weapons into court at https://brainly.com/question/10503783

#SPJ4

The strategy ot provide significant aid to European countries to help them rebuild.

Explanation:

The USA offered all Europen countries aid in total 13 billion dollars

The advantages of command and market economies are :

More variety of goods-  market economy

Less waste of resources-  command economy

No marketing costs-  command economy

Lower prices of goods-  command economy

Better quality of goods- market economy

The marketing refers to all activities or techniques a company does for promoting and selling products or services to the consumers or customers in the market.

The marketing makes use of the "marketing mix," also known as the four Ps—product, price, place, and promotion.

Marketing can be done through offline method(word-of-mouth) or online method( mail).

Learn more about marketing here:

https://brainly.com/question/29775565

#SPJ1

Answer:

B) the Know-Nothings......

Answer:

Yes!!

Explanation:

Côte d'Ivoire is the world's largest producer and exporter of cocoa (30% of the world production)! The country’s economy is mainly based on agriculture so you could even do other exports! They are one of the three bigger producer and exporter of cashew, and a major exporter of palm oil, coffee and oil.

Peter the Great, who ruled Russia from 1682-1725, was known for being an autocratic ruler, meaning he had absolute power and authority. Here are two examples of how he exercised this authority:

Reforms and modernizations: Peter the Great implemented a series of sweeping reforms and modernizations in Russia that were meant to westernize and modernize the country. These reforms included the creation of a standing army, the establishment of a navy, and the introduction of a new legal code. However, these reforms were often implemented with little or no input from the Russian nobility or the general population, and those who opposed them were often punished severely.

Suppression of dissent: Peter the Great was known for being very intolerant of dissent, and he would often use violence and intimidation to silence those who opposed his rule. He was also known for using secret police and other repressive measures to stamp out opposition and maintain his grip on power.

Overall, Peter the Great's autocratic rule was characterized by his willingness to use force and intimidation to get his way, and his complete lack of tolerance for dissent or opposition.