Answer:
Two actions which took place.
1) was it a defamation for the publisher - yes,
2) false light? no
Explanation:
It was a defamation of character from the publisher because what he did could cause harm to the young child, One thing is show though the accusation of a false light is a no. And lana can't complain about how her pictrue was made because she was in a public space so no reasonable expectation of privacy.
3. In what ways does the Sixth Amendment protect an accused individual after
he or she has been charged with a crime?
Answer:
they have the right to a fair public trial.
Explanation:
They have a right to a lawyer and a right to an impartial jury.
When you have an exclusive contract with a real estate agent, you can Select the best answer.
still work with other agents, as long as you disclose that you’re doing it
work with only the seller’s broker for 30 days
work with only buyer’s brokers
work with only that agent
The best choice would be work with only that agent as under such contract buyer can't work with another agent until the contract expires.
Exclusive contract represents that the agent has the exclusive right to sell the property whereas buyer still has right to find a buyer and however owes a commission to the agent during the contract period.
it usually takes place between buyer and agent.it helps in protecting the rights of agent as they invest their time and effort in finding the sells and buyer for the property.On the basis of the information mention above provide enough evidences for the providing best answer that is work with only that agent .
2.
A "state actor" is prohibited from interfering with private rights, unless there is a
constitutionally permissible reason to do so.
True or false
A crime is committed in a park on a rainy night. During the scene walk-through, muddy footprints are found on the sidewalk. When should they be
documented and photographed?
Immediately upon discovery
Immediately after a rough sketch is made
Immediately after overall scene photos are taken
Immediately after investigators put on protective equipment
Which of these is FALSE about the chain of custody? * 1 point If the chain of custody is broken, the evidence is often not used in court The chain of custody begins when the piece of evidence is brought to the crime lab Everyone who access the evidence is part of the chain of custody. The purpose of the chain of custody is to ensure that evidence taken from the crime scene is not altered before it is admitted to court
Answer:
The chain of custody begins when the piece of evidence is brought to the crime lab.
Explanation:
The chain of custody can be defined as a chronology of collecting evidence and the process of protecting the evidence thereafter. The chain of custody is a legal term used to define the documentation of any physical or electronic evidence from the crime scene.
The statement that is not true about the chain of custody from the given options is the second one. The statement is false that the chain of custody begins when evidence is presented in the crime lab rather the chain of custody begins when any piece of evidence is taken under custody, when it is collected by crime investigating officer from the crime scene. The moment any evidence is collected or taken under custody, the chain of custody of begins. Thus second statement from given options about the chain of custody is false.
do you think that wrongfully convicted should receive compensation after being released from jail/ prison? why or why not?
Answer:
In my personal opinion, the wrongfully convicted should receive compensation after being released from jail or prison.
Explanation:
Being questioned while being innocent can very much damage someone's mental health due to the immense pressure, and being put in jail/prison for something you did not do is overall unjust. The least that someone could get for being wrongfully convicted is atleast getting paid.
who is Prime Minister of world
Answer:
Sirimavo Bandaranaike is prime minister of world.Which supreme court decision set a precedent forcing police officers to determine if a suspect is an active, violent threat before using deadly force?
A. Mapp v. Ohio
B. Terry v. Ohio
C. Tennessee v. Garner
D. Crawford v. Washington
Identify one way to minimize violence with a person exhibiting the characteristics of a problem employee.
a. Try to impart technical or complicated information
b. Be an empathetic listener; encourage the person to talk and then listen patiently
c. Go strictly by the rules
d. Attempt to bargain with the individual
Answer:
b. Be an empathetic listener; encourage the person to talk and then listen patiently
Explanation:
There can be many characteristics of a problem employee such as changes in personality or dress, changes in health and hygiene, Inability to take criticism, and romantic obsession with another employee etcetera.
To minimize violence against the person with such characteristics, it is important to be an empathetic listener, pay attention to another person's issues, and identify or understand the emotion or problem, the person is going through. To be an empathetic listener, do not ask direct questions to the person rather encourage them to share their problems by their own and listen patiently without any defensive behavior.
It helps the problem employee to feel comfortable in the workplace and makes him more efficient.
Hence, the correct answer is "b."
The two 13-year-old girls are accused of stabbing a classmate with the intent of murdering her. According to the prosecutor, the girls planned the deed as a tribute to the fictional Slender Man, a paranormal creature who has supposedly been in existence for centuries. The girls found Slender Man on a Web site and decided to kill their friend to show devotion to the figure. Despite multiple stab wounds, the victim managed to crawl out of the woods where she had been abandoned. She was taken to a hospital and survived.
Was this crime an intentional murder (a homicide)? Should the two girls be charged as adults?
Answer:
yes it was a homicide and yes the two girls should be charged as adults.
Explanation:
I understand they listened to "Slenderman" but while the girls are getting charged they should seek to help their mental health . Because something could actually be wrong inside their heads. Even if it was someone telling them to do it , they still injured the female.Based on the given information, these activities is considered intentional murder, and the two girls will be charged as adults.
What is intentional murder?Intentional murder refers to an act of killing attempted by an individual in order to harm another person knowingly. unintentional murder is referred as harming another person mistakenly in self-defense.
In the given case, it is explained that The two 13-year-old girls are charged with purposefully attacking a classmate in order to kill her. The girls planned to murder their friend with respect to Slender Man after discovering him on a website.
The woman walked out of the woods where she had been placed despite having many stab wounds. Based on the woman's conditions and her statement the two girls are charged with homicide as they did the action in whole senses.
Learn more about intentional murder, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28460422
#SPJ2
Scott really enjoys working with money, including making it grow. He is also a natural leader and would enjoy working with and leading others. Which two career clusters would best fit Scott? the Finance Cluster and the Business, Management, and Administration Cluster the Human Services Cluster and the Business, Management, and Administration Cluster the Finance Cluster and the Education and Training Cluster the Education and Training Cluster and the Human Services Cluster
Answer:
The Finance Cluster and the Business, Management, and Administration Cluster
Explanation:
Answer:
The first option
Explanation:
An overworked and underpaid public defender is assigned to represent a prostitute who has no prior arrests and "works" to support a drug habit. What arguments from consequentialism might the attorney utilize when discussing this case with the assistant district attorney prosecuting the matter? Would these arguments change if the prostitute had been previously arrested and/or convicted? Explain your response.
Answer:
Explanation:
So if the courts know the defendant is an addict and a street worker they will let her go either way in the states and in other countries its just another job but as it is illegal in the states it doesn't matter to the courts, jury, lawyers, and police shes just another speck of dirt and a wh***. My uncle is a lawyer and my brother is in college for law school
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Which Amendment gives the states the powers to have their own constitutions?
A 5th Amendment
B. 10th Amendment
C. 19th Amendment
D. 22nd Amendment
Answer:
it would be the 10th amendment.
Explanation:
because
PLEASE HELP: The physical requirements for being an FBI agent include _____.
passing the physical fitness test, or PTF
never having been convicted of a felony
passing a hearing and vision test
passing a complete medical review
Answer:
the answer is all of them
Explanation:
Answer:
All :)
Explanation:
I just took the quiz :)
An example of a valid I’d is
emergence of federalism in Nigeria
Answer:
Bernard Bourdillon the Governor-general at that time initiated and laid the foundation of federalism in Nigeria in 1939 by creating three provinces. From 1901 to 1958, the number of regions was increased to three through both acquisition of territories and partition from existing provinces.
Explanation:
Bernard Bourdillon the Governor-general at that time initiated and laid the foundation of federalism in Nigeria in 1939 by creating three provinces. From 1901 to 1958, the number of regions was increased to three through both acquisition of territories and partition from existing provinces.
Hope this helped.
Being tardy is an example of _____.
Answer:
being late
Explanation:
Definition of tardy is slow moving, delayed, or late.
Name two main reasons people chose to come to the American colonies.
A, to benefit from the colonies’ long summers and short winters
B.
to benefit from the colonies’ short summers and long winters
C.
to escape political unrest and a poor climate in England
D.
to seek religious freedom and economic opportunity
Answer:
it would be A and D
Explanation:
Well the truth is back in the day that's what people wanted to do.
Is it okay, legally, for the police to use a suspect's DNA to create a
fake profile on a public DNA site in order to help identify relatives
of that suspect?
Answer:
Under the new policy, police can’t quietly upload a fake profile to a genealogy website, as some have done in hopes of finding a suspect’s distant relatives, without first identifying themselves.
Explanation:
John, Paul, George, and Ringo began discussing the possibility of going into business together.
John is a creative baker and has long dreamed of opening his own bakery. He even has a name picked out – BakeEm Fresh Daily. Unfortunately, he is a single parent raising two small children and does not feel he can afford to invest any of his approximately $4,500 in savings into such a business. His friends, however, think that they may be able to help.
Paul won $200,000 in the lottery. He does not want anything to do with the day-to-day running of a business. He would be willing to invest up to $100,000 in the business.
George inherited a small two-story building, worth $76,000, in the downtown area that could easily house a bakery. He would be too busy to help run the business, but he would be willing to let the others use his building to house the bakery.
Finally, Ringo feels that he is a born salesperson and manager. He doesn’t have much money to contribute, but he wants to work as the bakery salesperson and manager.
Based on all the different types of business organizations we have covered; you need to discuss each parties’ concerns and interests to determine which type of business organization each of these people (as individuals) would prefer.
Answer: gay
Explanation: because that is what u are lol XD
Statutes and regulations governing Florida attorneys prohibit targeted solicitations to victims and and their relatives for thirty days following an accident or disaster. Noted "ambulance chasing" lawyer Rufus T. Firefly or his agents routinely contact accident victims as soon as possible following an accident in the hospital cafeteria for example. Mr. Firefly has filed suit seeking to have these provisions declared invalid. Discuss whether the Florida limitation upon Mr. Firefly and other Florida lawyers is valid under the US Constitution.
Answer:
This is valid and legal
Explanation:
under the united States constitution this florida limitation is valid. in a case that involved florida bar vs went for it, the supreme court has ruled that the state can shield harmed floridians from lawyers. the supreme court ruling is that states have a control over forceful lawyers who would want to send such solicitation letters during a period of 30 days to accident victims and their families.
what are opinions or feelings about the candidates(2020 debate) ?
Answer:
They are Both Unworthy
Explanation:
I feel that both candidates have so many conflicts. There hasn't been this political of an election in so many years. I feel like America can do better picking their candidates. For years now we have ignored the people who would actually do well in office because there is nothing in for being president other than stress and work. I mean the debate yesterday was so unprofessional from both sides it was embarrassing. My final thoughts: We can do better.
The local mall' has had complaints about roaming groups of teenagers frightening away the clientele. In an effort to address the shopkeeper's concerns,
the mall has posted a sign that limits the number of teenagers who can enter the
mall and travel through it together to two. What possible constitutional
violations could this ban create?
Answer:
Violations of the First Amendment
Explanation:
Given that the First Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to the freedom of assembly. Hence, any form of restriction of the teenagers from assembling in public spaces, including the local mall would be considered as a violation of the first amendment.
Hence, in this situation, the possible constitutional violations this ban could create is that of "First Amendment"
How should we evaluate a candidate's performance in a debate?
Answer:
A political debate is a confrontation of ideas between two or more candidates for a certain position, where both try to convince the electorate to vote for them. Electoral debates, such as the one recently held between President Trump, candidate of the Republican Party, and Joe Biden, candidate of the Democratic Party, are especially important.
To determine who is the candidate who has best developed his performance in the debate, the power of conviction that this has had in front of the voters must be evaluated, as well as the dominance of the debated topics and, especially, his prevalence against the other candidate on the discussed issues.
The performance of a candidate in a debate can be evaluated based on the power of conviction and the dominance that a candidate has over others.
Debate refers to the formal discussion regarding a particular issue in a legislative assembly or in a public meeting.In a debate, the arguments of the opposition will be put forward and can end with a vote. It should be noted that a political debate occurs between the candidates who want to hold certain political post whereby they're give their ideas and convince the people to vote for them.In conclusion, the performance of a candidate can be evaluated based on how much candidate was able to convince the electorates.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/13674408
An officer enters a home by lying to the home owner by saying she has a search warrant. The owner of the home was never shown the warrant and the officer finds drug paraphernalia and a small baggie of cocaine. They arrest the owner of the home. In court, the owner of the home asks that the evidence not be admitted due to the false warrant. What would the Supreme Court rule? Which case provides precedent for this situation that falls under the 4th Amendment? I Need help
answer:
the supreme court would most likely deem that based on the fact that a law enforment officer forced entry into your home and lied saying that they had a warrant, that, that was a unreasonable search and seizure under the law.
explanation:
the police may knock and announce their presence at your door but unless they have a warrant, you are not required to open the door, to answer any questions, or to cooperate with the police in any fashion.
(source: libertylaw.ca)
"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,"
"no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
(source: constitution of united states of america 1789 *revised in 1992*)
"the fourth amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government"
"however, not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law."
(source: uscourts.gov)
so
the supreme court would most likely deem that based on the fact that a law enforment officer forced entry into your home and lied saying that they had a warrant, that, that was a "unreasonable" "search and seizure" "under the law."
What do both state and local taxes fund? Student loans public schools social security city parks
Answer:
b) public schools
Explanation:
edge 2020
State and local taxes fund are public schools. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What are taxes?
A tax is a monetary payment that people make to the government in return for the services it provides.
Public welfare, higher education, health and hospitals, highways and roads, criminal justice, and housing are some of the numerous areas where state and municipal government spending is broken down.
As a result, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on taxes, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23347326
#SPJ2
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST :)
Which Supreme Court decision set a precedent allowing police to search a property without a warrant as long as the tenants whom are present consent to the search at the time of the search?
A. Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
B. Crawford v. Washington (2004)
C. Maryland v. King (2013)
D. Fernandez v. California (2014)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
cannot be A. cause that case was about authorizing police use of deadly force to apprehend fleeing.
cannot be B cause that case gives defendants the right to confront witnesses and cross-examine their testimony.
cannot be C cause that case allows to collect DNA samples from individuals who are arrested for a crime of violence
it is D .
The Supreme Court decision set a precedent allowing police to search a property without a warrant as long as the tenants who are present consent to the search at the time of the search Fernandez v. California (2014). Thus the correct option is D.
What was Supreme Court?The Supreme court is the highest judiciary body in the country which evaluates whether the laws are practiced properly or not. It helps to check the activities that are unconstitutional in the country and take strict actions against them.
Georgia v. Randolph, a judgment from 2006 that found that co-objection residents declare searching permission unlawful, was tested to its limitations in Fernandez v. California (2014).
The Supreme Court ruled that an inhabitant who was unavailable because of a valid arrest or imprisonment was on equal ground with an occupant who was missing for any other reason.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about Supreme Court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ2
System of law which uses precedents in order to ensure consistency is
A.
rule of law
B.
bill of rights
C.
constitutional law
D.
common law
Answer:
..
Explanation:
Answer:
it maybe be c
What political office are the candidates in this debate seeking? Have you already formed any opinions or feelings about the candidates?
Answer:
Hello. You have not added any text or other media to complement your question. As a result, there is a lack of information for your question to be answered, but I can help you by stating that candidates who participate in debates, seek to be elect for the president of the republic or state governor.
Explanation:
Political debates are important for voters to hear proposals and justifications from candidates for the main political positions (president and governor). That way, voters can listen to their candidates, observe their skills, reasoning ability, communication skills, posture and proposals. This allows voters to make better choices regarding voting and to have more contact with potential candidates.
A customer was shopping at the handbag counter of the defendant’s store. She did not make any purchase and left the store. When she was a few feet away from the store, a store employee tapped her lightly on the shoulder to attract her attention and asked her if she had made any purchases. When she inquired why, he asked, "what about the bag in your hand?" the customer said it belonged to her, and she opened it to show by its contents that it was not a new bag. The employee gave the customer a dirty look and went back in to the store. The customer then sued the store for false imprisonment. Was the store liable?
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
False imprisonment occurs when a person is detained without justifiable reason. The customer mentioned in the text above was not arrested, neither the employee nor the store owner used force to force her to open the bag. Even though the employee did not look at the customer with courtesy, he did not arrest her, did not use force against her or prevent her from continuing on her way, which indicates that there was no action that could indicate that the employee or the store promoted false imprisonment.
