Answer: B
Explanation:
Answer:a
Explanation:
g every civil case in california begins with the filing of a(n) by the plaintiff. the defendant must then submit a(n) to this filing within thirty (30) days in which they either admit or deny every allegation that the plaintiff has made, and following this process, the parties will engage in a pretrial process of exchanging documents and asking questions of witnesses as well as experts, which is known as .
The parties will engage in a pretrial process of exchanging documents and asking questions of witnesses as well as experts, which is known as Discovery
What is the concept of Discovery?
Both sides participate in discovery to start the trial preparation process. The parties are formally exchanging information regarding the witnesses and evidence they'll use at trial during this procedure.
Before the trial even starts, the parties might learn what evidence might be used through discovery. It is intended to prevent "trial by ambush," in which one side learns of the other's testimony or evidence only during the trial, leaving no opportunity for the other side to provide rebuttal evidence.
Through depositions, a party can learn in advance what a witness would testify about at the trial. Important witnesses who are unable to attend the trial can nonetheless be called as witnesses through depositions. In that case, they were again read throughout the trial as evidence.
Want to know more about Discovery?
https://brainly.in/question/31590289
#SPJ4
4. How conclusive do you believe entomology evidence can be? Support your statements with facts.
Answer:
Explanation:
Right from the early stages insects are attracted to the decomposing body and may lay eggs in it. By studying the insect population and the developing larval stages, forensic scientists can estimate the postmortem index, any change in position of the corpse as well as the cause of death.
the city of la mesa has proposed a city ordinance prohibiting all political advertising on bus stop benches. a court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of
A court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of Model Code of Conduct does not violate Article 19(1)(a)
What are the rules around political advertising?
The accuracy of the information in political advertisements is not yet required by law. You can get in touch with the advertiser directly or your representative in local government if you have concerns about a political advertisement.
When must political ads stop?
The Broadcasting Services Act of 1992, which is overseen by ACMA, contains a clause that governs the broadcasting blackout period. From the conclusion of the Wednesday before election day until the end of voting on election day, no election advertisements may be broadcast on radio or television.
To know more about political ads follow the given link https://brainly.com/question/6304254
#SPJ4
Describe the use of fingerprints in a police investigation, from collecting prints at the crime scene to presenting it as evidence in a trial.
john was driving his friend, mary, back to her home in his new car. on the way to mary's home, the car's brakes malfunctioned and they got into an accident. based on just these facts, the lawsuit with the greatest likelihood of succeeding would be:
Answer:
A lawsuit of the cost of damages on the company that John bought the car from.
Explanation:
if correct, pls mark smartest
What type of evidence can be pulled from both a computer and a portable device?
O images
O Text history
O GPS coordinates
O Phone call data
Answer:
images
Explanation:
How do you think a legal positivist would justify compulsory schooling?
I think a legal positivist would defend mandatory education as a way for children to properly grow their brains and understand the fundamentals of right and wrong. Additionally, it would instil in them the discipline needed to manage their time well, which will be crucial for their careers.
What do legal positivists believe in?Legal positivism is a legal philosophy that places an emphasis on how socially produced law is and how conventional it is. Legal positivism holds that law is synonymous with positive norms, i.e., norms created by legislators or regarded as common law or case law.
What is the legal principles of positivist school of thought?One of the most influential philosophical theories of the nature of law, legal positivism is characterised by two central tenets: (1) social facts—such as information about human behaviour and intentions—solely determine the existence and content of law; and (2) there is no inescapable link between morality and the law.
To learn more about legal positivist visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3521592
#SPJ13
Which of the following is a reason that a person could not serve on a jury?
a.They have a bias towards the accuser.
b.They don't know how to interpret law.
c.They are a citizen of the United States.
d.They are not a judge.
laws regulating the sale of alcohol serve the purpose of: a) preventing the sale of alcohol to minors under 21 years of age b) preventing the sale of alcohol to people who are intoxicated c) all of the above
Answer:
c
Explanation:
laws regulating the sale of alcohol serve the purpose of all of the above. The correct option is c.
The prohibition of selling alcohol to anyone under the legal drinking age of 21 as well as the prohibition against selling alcohol to people who are already intoxicated are two of the many goals of laws governing the sale of alcohol.
These laws are put into effect to increase public safety, stop underage drinking and the risks that come with it and lessen alcohol related harm. These laws seek to protect vulnerable groups, uphold order and encourage socially responsible alcohol consumption by enforcing age restrictions and outlawing the sale of alcohol to intoxicated people.
learn more about sale of alcohol here
brainly.com/question/4818130
#SPJ2
in the federal court system, each circuit court of appeals has group of answer choices a few state court judges who also serve as circuit court judges. a range of permanent judgeships depending on the workload of the circuit. one permanent judge. 50 permanent judges and 100 part-time judges.
In the federal court system, each circuit court of appeals has a range of permanent judgeships depending on the workload of the circuit.
There are three sorts of federal courts within the federal system: 94 District Courts (trial courts), 13 Courts of Appeals (intermediate appellate courts), and the United States Supreme Court (the court of final review).Federal courts have unique authority to interpret the law, evaluate its constitutionality, and apply it to specific situations. The courts, like Congress, can employ subpoenas to compel the production of evidence and testimony.The 94 federal judicial districts are divided into 12 regional circuits, each with an appeals court. The appeal court's role is to determine whether the law was correctly applied in the trial court. Appeals courts are made up of three judges and do not use juries.Thus the correct option is B.
To learn more about circuit court of appeals, refer: https://brainly.com/question/24978344
#SPJ1
When an officer makes a vehicle stop what four things should he/she transmit to dispatch
When an officer makes a vehicle stop the four things should he/she transmit to dispatch include -
That they stopped a vehicleThe CYMBALS informationThe occupant informationThe location of the stopSo, when an officer stops a vehicle, above mentioned are the four things which should he/she should transmit in order to dispatch. Thus, there are certain procedures which they have to abide by and one of these include transmitting certain information back to dispatch.
They also need to tell dispatch that they have made a vehicular stop, and also then they should send the CYMBALS (Color, Year, Make, Body Type...).
Hence, they should also transmit the location of the stop.
To learn more about the CYMBALS here:
https://brainly.com/question/14711592
#SPJ1
The attitude someone has when committing a
crime, their intentions
The attitude someone has when committing crime, their intentions is celled mens rea.
The required details about intention is mentioned in below paragraph.
Intentions are intellectual states wherein the agent commits themselves to a path of motion. Having the plan to go to the zoo the next day is an instance of an goal. The motion plan is the content material of the goal even as the dedication is the mindset closer to this co
For human beings, however, having an goal means (a) that one has fashioned the view that the motion is really helpful, and which means that one want now no longer boost once more the query of whether or not it's miles really helpful to do so.
The plural of provision is mentes reae. A mens rea refers back to the dominion of thoughts statutorily needed on the thanks to convict a particular litigator of a selected crime.
Thus, mens rea is the attitude of someone committing a crime.
To learn about mens rea from the link.
https://brainly.com/question/15071197
#SPJ9
hijackers of a truck carrying dog food were arrested and indicted by a grand jury. during the grand jury's investigation. the district attorney's office subpoenaed the truck driver as a witness. to her relief, she was not asked questions about a series of thefts of shipments of dog chew toys that she was involved in, but believes that the subject might be brought up at trial by the defense lawyers. she is afraid that she likely will be fired if she invokes the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination on the witness stand, so she wants to avoid testifying at all at the trial, even if she is subpoenaed by the defense. as her lawyer, what advice should you give her about complying with a subpoena?
She cannot refuse to testify since she is permitted to invoke the Fifth Amendment while testifying.
With the exception of situations involving members of the armed forces, no one may be tried for a capital offense or other infamous crime without a grand jury's presentment or indictment or the militia who are serving in actual combat or other times of public danger; no one may be twice put in danger of losing their life or limb for the same offense; no one may be forced to testify against themselves in a criminal case; and no one may be deprived of their life, liberty, or property.A number of rights important to both criminal and civil judicial processes are established by the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment forbids "double jeopardy" in criminal proceedings, guarantees the right to a grand jury, and protects against self-incrimination. The "life, liberty, or property" of a citizen must also be preserved by "due process of law," and the government must compensate when removing private property for public use.Thus this is the meaning of Fifth Amendment.
Refer here to learn more about Fifth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/1332952
#SPJ4
a state trooper stopped a defendant for speeding five miles per hour over the speed limit on an interstate highway. initially, the trooper only intended to issue the defendant a warning, but when the defendant refused the trooper's request for a consent search of the car for drugs, the trooper retrieved his narcotics-detection dog from the patrol car and walked around the defendant's car. the dog alerted at the trunk. based on that alert, the trooper searched the trunk and found several grams of cocaine in the defendant's locked suitcase. the defendant was arrested. the entire incident took less than ten minutes, and it was recorded on a video camera located in the patrol car. prior to his jury trial, the defendant's attorney filed a motion to suppress the cocaine based on an illegal search and seizure under the fourth amendment. should the defendant's motion be granted?
No, as the cocaine was illegally taken.
The car was initially stopped for breaking traffic laws, in accordance with the Fourth Amendment. Additionally, the fourth amendment permits the employment of drug dogs to approach an automobile that was first stopped for another infraction without any reasonable suspicion.The Bill of Rights is comprised of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It outlaws arbitrary searches and seizures. It also specifies standards for the issuance of warrants, such as that they must be issued by a court or magistrate, be backed by evidence of probable cause and an oath or affirmation, and clearly specify the area that will be searched as well as the people or items that will be taken.Thus this is the meaning of Fourth Amendment.
Refer here to learn more about Fourth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/17104412
#SPJ4
An oral contract for $300 item is enforceable
True or false
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
If both parties agree to the contract, they both have to keep their end of the deal.
Pls mark brainliest
It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.
Can you enforce a verbal contract?As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.
Is an oral agreement still binding?A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.
Learn more about oral contract: https://brainly.com/question/15104947
#SPJ13
scotland provides an especially good contemporary example of substantive criminal law in the common legal tradition because scottish courts take an active role in judge-made law. true false
It is TRUE that scottland provides an especially good contemporary example of substantive criminal law.
What is substantive criminal law ?
Civil law's rights and obligations and criminal law's offences and penalties are defined by substantive law. It may be enshrined in statutes or be recogonised by common law tradition.
What is an example of substantive?
A substantive law establishes a legal connection or forbids particular behaviour. In other words, it specifies what you are able to do. For instance, a state that prohibits stealing. Such a law would be substantive.
To know more about law follow the given link https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
what is the main idea of amendment 1
Answer:
freedom of speech. that every individual has the right to a voice and opinion
Explanation:
there are many methods of discovery, and state laws often provide for broad discovery (such as encouraging the sharing of information among parties to a lawsuit). why do you think discovery is encouraged?
Discovery is encouraged so they can be appropriately arranged for the preliminary. Discovery is the way toward trading the data between the gatherings that will be displayed at the preliminary. The reason for existing is to make the gatherings mindful of the proof that might be introduced at the preliminary.
The primary forms of written discovery are Interrogatories, Requests for the production of documents, and Requests for Admissions. Shape Interrogatories permit a celebration to invite common questions from a list of questions provided with the aid of the California courts.
The criminal process of producing a list of all files associated with the complaints presently or previously inside the birthday party's ownership. If files have been previously inside the party's ownership, the birthday celebration can even need to specify after they had them, and to who they were disbursed.
The discovery segment consists of two key factors: making plans for collection to ensure that statistics are accrued, controlled, and shared in a scientific and planned manner. Amassing facts the usage of a spread of methods.
Learn more about Discovery here https://brainly.com/question/6640162
#SPJ4
During which of the following decades in American history was the crime rate
relatively stable?
The 1950s
The 1960s
The 1970s
The 1980s
Answer:
The 1950s
Explanation:
Following World War II, the crime rate in America remained relatively stable until the 1960s, when reported criminal activity increased dramatically.
There are four main juvenile justice systems at the state level.
Question 4 options:
1) True
2) False
what two statements accurately characterize civil law? multiple select question. a jury typically issues the decision. judges often actively question the prosecution and defense. civil law tends to be less adversarial than common law. the role of the judge is to interpret the law.
Civil law is concerned with interpersonal conflicts. Although secularized over time and emphasizing individual freedom more, the civil law tradition encourages human cooperation.
What is the civil law?Civil law is concerned with interpersonal conflicts. -When a civil law is broken, the plaintiff, or the party claiming harm, files charges against the defendant, or the accused offender. The punishment for civil infractions is a monetary payment to the plaintiff. - Torts and contracts are two categories of civil law. Personnel perform their duties and exercise their management. Civil law is concerned with interpersonal conflicts. - When a civil law is breached, the victim, also known as the plaintiff, files a lawsuit against the alleged perpetrator, also known as the defendant. The punishment for civil infractions is a monetary payment to the plaintiff. - Torts and contracts are two categories of civil law.Although secularized over time and emphasizing individual freedom more, the civil law tradition encourages human cooperation.To learn more about civil law refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ4
tonya is an attorney. she is preparing evidence to be presented in a court trial. her exhibits include several photographs, printouts of email messages, and printouts of text messages. what type of evidence is tonya preparing?
Since Tonya is preparing evidence to be presented in a court trial and her exhibits include several photographs, printouts of email messages, and printouts of text messages, the type of evidence she is preparing is: Documentary evidence.
What is an evidence?In English literature, an evidence can be defined as a collection of factual information that comprises empirical statistics and analysis, which are typically used to show or prove that an action, event, message, etc., is credible, reliable, truthful, and verified.
The type of evidence.In Law, there are different type of evidence and these include the following:
Demonstrative evidenceTestimonial evidenceReal evidenceDocumentary evidenceGenerally speaking, a documentary evidence simply refers to a type of evidence that is tendered or presented through documents such as books, maps, printouts of email messages, photographs, printed text-based document, etc.
Read more on documentary evidence here: https://brainly.com/question/28848551
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Tonya is an attorney. She is preparing evidence to be presented in a court trial. Her exhibits include several photographs, printouts of email messages, and printouts of text messages. What type of evidence is Tonya preparing?
Demonstrative evidence
Documentary evidence
Testimonial evidence
Real evidence
4. How does the plaintiff, Mrs. Wood, try to implicate the gun manufacturer (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced
a person who had been convicted of a felony 10 years ago was turned down for license. if he still desired a license, what is his next course of action?
His next course of action is Request a hearing before the Administrative Hearing Commission.
What is hearing?
A hearing refers to any formal proceeding before a court. The term usually refers to a brief court session that resolves a specific question before a full court trial takes place, or to such specialized proceedings as administrative hearings.
What is the purpose of hearing?
A hearing is a meeting or session of a Senate, House, joint, or special committee of Congress, usually open to the public, to obtain information and opinions on proposed legislation, conduct an investigation, or evaluate/oversee the activities of a government department or the implementation of a Federal law.
To learn more about hearing from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/5000833
#SPJ4
if a reasonable period of time passes after a minor reaches legal age and he or she has said nothing about disaffirming the contract, then in the eyes of the law it is considered as:
Answer:
Contractual capacity is defined by the law to mean the ability to understand the
consequences of a contract. This definition does not require that a person understand
the actual terms of the contract which may be written in technical legal terminology.
Nor does the definition require that the person have merely the actual understanding
of the terms whether expressed in legal terminology or not. Contractual capacity
requires only that she or he possess the ability to understand the consequences of
the terms.
There are two broad categories of parties that are recognized to lack the capacity:
1) Those who are said to be incapacitated and have special contractual rights due to a
legally recognized lack of such capacity. This group includes minors, the intoxicated, and
the mentally impaired.
2) The second category is made up of those who “lack the authority” to enter an agreement.
We will examine this group in the next lesson.
1. Incapacitated Parties - Minors
Incapacitated parties are assumed by the law to lack the maturity and experience to protect their
self-interests in contractual negotiations. The law grants these parties special contractual
protections designed to keep them from being cheated due to their lack of such contractual
capacity. Parties who have special contractual rights due to a legally recognized lack of such
capacity include minors, the intoxicated, and the mentally impaired.
Explanation:
Two neighbors have a conflict over the boundary between their properties. Both are talking to their own attorneys, but they wish to settle without involving anyone else. Which method of dispute resolution will they use?
A. Court action
B. Negotiation
C. Mediation
D. Arbitration
Two neighbors have a conflict over the boundary between their properties. Both are talking to their own attorneys, but they wish to settle without involving anyone else. They will use Negotiation method of dispute resolution.
Any kind of communication, whether direct or indirect, in which people with divergent interests debate potential collaborative actions to manage and ultimately settle their conflict is referred to as negotiation. Negotiations can be used to establish a future relationship between two or more parties or to fix an issue that has already arisen. Depending on the situation and the negotiating team's objectives, an attorney's role will change during a negotiation.
None of the parties to a voluntary negotiation are required to participate. The parties are free to accept or reject the results of the negotiations and to halt the procedure at any time. Parties have the option of taking part in the negotiations personally or choosing to have a third party, such as a relative, friend, attorney, or other professional, represent them.
Learn more about Conflicts here:
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ1
Jeremy puts his trash out at the end of the road to be picked up. Police are investigating Jeremy for selling drugs out of his home, so they conduct a warrantless "trash pull" by
taking the trash bags out of his trash cans and putting the bags in the back of their patrol cars. They bring the bags back to the police station and go through Jeremy's trash,
looking for evidence of drug sales. Did the police violate any of Jeremy's constitutional rights?
No, because the trash was considered abandoned property
Yes, the 5th Amendment was violated
No, because there was probable cause with exigent circumstances
Yes, the 4th Amendment was violated
4
how could a forensic ipse dixit statute potentially take away the defendant's constitutional rights in a courtroom if not for the melendez-diaz v. massachusetts (2009) decision?
It can take away by not allowing the lack of cross-examination of the forensic analyst
The government is relieved of its burden of proof by the forensic ipse dixit statutes, which also deny defendants the right to confrontation. Additionally, these laws encourage negligence and fraud in crime laboratories, inhibit robust defense advocacy, and raise the possibility of erroneous convictions and penalties. It is not a ridiculous quirk of Texas law that this forensic ipse dixit statute exists.
This forensic ipse dixit statute has been adopted by almost all of the states in the union. In the great majority of American jurisdictions, live testimony is not required to substantiate forensic claims; instead, the state may rely on a forensic certificate. If not for the Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009) ruling the forensic analyst would not be cross-examined, resulting in negligent practice and increased rates of false convictions, a forensic ipse dixit statute may potentially take away the defendant's constitutional rights in a trial.
Read more about cross-examination on:
https://brainly.com/question/28523666
#SPJ4
rosa parks broke a law by refusing to give up her seat on a bus for a white man. ultimately, this act was a pivotal moment in the launch of the civil rights movement. rosa parks's refusal to move to the back of the bus is an example of .
Answer:
Pretty sure it was an example of positive deviance.
Explanation:
How can you avoid confirmation bias?
O Seek information from people with different viewpoints.
O Follow links that pop up from your favorite websites.
O Read news from one main source for consistency.
O Allow your applications to share your data.
Answer: Read news from one main source for consistency.
Explanation:
How can we avoid confirmation bias?
1. Be aware that confirmation bias exists.
Understand that we are inherently biased against new information. It doesn’t mean we’re bad; it means we’re human.
2. Seek out new information.
Look for ways to challenge what you already think. Proactively investigate and engage new information, experiences, and viewpoints. Give them a fair hearing.
3. Talk to people outside your circle.
Gather information from a wide range of sources, not just those you normally peruse. Listen to what others are saying. Hear their stories.
4. Play devil’s advocate
Get someone to play devil’s advocate with you to test what you currently believe. Are there holes in your thinking? If not, great. Maybe you’ve been right all along.
But stay open to truth so you can see it when it presents itself. Don’t fight against something just because it’s different from what you once believed.
How did Jesus handle it?
Jesus faced a huge challenge with the Jewish people when he arrived on earth. They were already steeped in centuries of believing that they only were “right.” When Jesus introduced new wineskins, a new command, a new way of living, many of his listeners automatically tuned out.
So Jesus often used stories to wake people out of their confirmation biases. He taught by engaging their imaginations. He helped them see from a different vantage point so they could open their minds to accept the truths he was bringing instead of refusing to let go of their old thoughts.
And he brought them new experiences to rattle the old ways of thinking. His miracles were mind-blowing, creating space for new ways of thinking. Even still, many refused to accept his new ideas.
As we live in the new opportunities he brings us and see his miracles of grace around us, may we open our minds to new ways of experiencing him and discovering truth.
Answer:
Seek information from people with different viewpoints.
Explanation:
I got it right on the law studies test.
To quote the textbook, "Part of the difficulty in critically consuming information is that people are likely to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs and expectations. This is known as confirmation bias. No one likes to feel as though they are wrong or have faulty ideas. So, seeking information that actively challenges existing beliefs and expectations is uncomfortable. People are less likely to do things they find uncomfortable."
