Vertical enforcement. Vertical enforcement is the application of domestic laws, such as those that forbid homicide or theft in the United States.
- More about vertical enforcement :
- In order to implement a particular policy, vertical policy enforcement refers to multi-level policies that integrate governance enforcement procedures vertically.
- Such a policy is enforced, for instance, during the enterprise planning and project approval procedures as well as the service design and service portfolio management processes.
- Examples of active vertical policies include preferential currency allocation that depends on export success, R&D funding, tax breaks for businesses entering new industries.
To know more about vertical enforcement, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/28943122?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
powerpoint slides about the difference between hick's law and fitt's law. when is it best to use one law over the other, and why are they important in designing?
Users will take longer to decide if they are presented with more stimuli (or options).
What is Hick's law ?
William Edmund Hick and Ray Hyman, a British and American psychology partnership, are the namesakes of Hick's Law (also known as the Hick-Hyman Law). These two researchers set out to investigate the connection between the quantity of stimuli present and a person's response time to each stimulus in 1952. It seems sense that the more stimuli a user has to pick from, the longer it takes for them to decide which one to interact with. Users that are presented with several options must take their time to understand and make decisions, which results in their being assigned tasks they don't want to accomplish.
In other words Hick's Law simply states that when more options are provided it takes longer to decide which option to chose .
to learn more about hick's law click
https://brainly.com/question/13710772
#SPJ4
Gerald's wife is ill and needs expensive medication, money for which Gerald does not have. In desperation, Gerald buys a gun and uses it to hold up a store to get enough money to buy the medication. As a result, Gerald is prosecuted. This is an example of
As Gerald uses a gun in a store to get enough money to buy the medication and get prosecuted after that. This is an example of criminal law because it concerns behavior so threatening that society outlaws it altogether.
What is a criminal law?As a branch of law, the criminal law means the body of law that relates to crime. It is mostly prescribes for conduct perceived as threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral welfare of people inclusive of one's self.
Going forward, most of our criminal law are established by statute, that is, most of our the laws are enacted by a legislature. It also includes the punishment and rehabilitation of people who violate such laws.
Missing options"a. morality because Gerald is trying to save his ill wife. b. criminal law because it concerns behavior so threatening that society outlaws it altogether. C. civil law because it regulates the rights and duties between parties, d. constitutionality because the U.S. Constitution allows citizens to save their loved ones."
Read more about criminal law
brainly.com/question/199340
#SPJ1
If a 17 year old girl married her 18 year old bf with her parents consent does that emancipated her from dcf custody?
my gf is 17 and lives in florida with me in my house she is happy here and i’m 18 her mother allows her to stay here with me and i have a stable income i have a job and a house so money is no problem and i am able to provide for her but she’s had a case with DCF in Massachusetts before she’s been dating me and they are planning on taking her back in a couple days because of a family situation so i was wonder if we get legally married with her mothers consent before dcf takes her would that make her emancipated and remove her custody from dcf?
If her mother has legal custody and can provide consent. If your love and feelings are genuine, you will be together for no more than a year until she turns 18. This is by no means a justification for marriage.
What is child custody?The legal and practical relationship between a parent or guardian and a child in their care is referred to as child custody in the context of guardianship. Legal custody—the authority to make decisions regarding the kid—and physical custody—the obligation to house, feed, and otherwise look after the child—are both parts of child custody. Legal and physical custody of children are typically shared by married parents. Common legal actions involving child custody decisions include divorce, annulment, separation, adoption, and parental death. Most jurisdictions base child custody decisions on what is in the child's best interests.
To learn more about child custody, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28282860
#SPJ13
Instructions: Read the following classic selection: Howard Becker's Becoming a Marijuana User. Explain how differential association and social learning theories apply to the example presented by Becker. What particular aspects of the theories do you see in the study?
The theory of Social learning is the aspect that is present in deviant behavior of Marijuana user because the theory holds that a social behavior is learned by observing and imitating the behavior of others.
What do "How Becoming a Marijuana User" explained?Howard Becker’s work titled “How to Become a Marihuana User” was written during when marijuana smoking was not as “main stream” as it is today. It was during when the people were not debating on whether or not to legalize its but rather, they were trying to discover where this drug fit into society.
In Becker’s paper, he makes an argument that marijuana users are not deviant people who are participating in deviant behavior but rather, that the deviant behavior in smoking marijuana and the pleasure gotten creates a person who is then in turn thought of as deviant. This shows that the person has to first experience an action that people would consider deviant, get a pleasure out of that action and then continue to participate in that activity in order to become what society considers a deviant person.
Read more about Social learning
brainly.com/question/17606689
#SPJ1
Analyze the legal requirements of a law
When you read information on the Internet, you must _____
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?.
The supporters of the 2019 Texas law that banned straight-ticket voting stated that it would boost voter understanding.
All judicial offices in Texas are currently elected on a partisan basis. For interim court vacancies, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county leaders and confirmation by the Senate. According to the Texas constitution, district and appellate judges are chosen by public vote. Unless the candidate passes a severe independent campaign criterion, only a judicial candidate who has been proclaimed the victor of a party primary is permitted to compete on the official ballot in the general election.Thus this is what Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas made argument in support of the law.
Learn more about Texas Law here: https://brainly.com/question/28996037
#SPJ4
Identify and describe different personal values that influenced what happed in the Texas v White
The different personal values that influenced what happened in the Texas v White is that, Texas v. White, where states did not have the right to unilaterally secede from the United States.
Texas v. White was considered to be a case which was argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869. This case thus involved a claim by the Reconstruction government of that Texas, that United States bonds owned by Texas which were almost since 1850 had been illegally sold by the Confederate state legislatur, which was during the American Civil War.
Here, states were not given the right to unilaterally secede from the United States. As it was held that the United States is considered to be an indestructible union from which no state can secede.
Hence, Texas v. White was a significant case in the American Supreme Court's history.
To learn more about the Texas v. White here:
https://brainly.com/question/18789720
#SPJ1
Liz owns a small technology firm where she has sole control and has personal liability for any business debts that arise. This is an example of which form of legal organization?.
This is an example of Sole proprietorship.
An individual who runs an unincorporated business on their own is known as a sole proprietor. If you are the lone member of a domestic limited liability company (LLC), you are not considered a sole proprietor if you choose to handle the LLC as a corporation.A sole proprietorship, also known as a sole tradership, individual entrepreneurship, or proprietorship, is a type of business owned and operated by a single person with no legal distinction between the owner and the business organization. A sole trader does not always work alone and may hire others.Small enterprises such as a local grocery store, a local clothing store, an artist, freelance writer, IT consultant, freelance graphic designer, and so on are examples of sole owners.Thus the answer is Sole proprietorship.
Refer here to learn more about Sole proprietorship: https://brainly.com/question/12913114
#SPJ4
Expert witnesses are paid for their testimony by either the prosecution or the defense. In your opinion, what ethical problems, if any, does this common practice raise? What role does cross-examination play in limiting any potential problems with partisan expert witnesses?
An expert witness most suitable found in countries with common law such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States, is a person whose opinion by virtue of education, training, certification, skills or experience, is accepted by the judge as an expert.
Below you can read more about Ethical problems of expert witnesses.
Ethical problems of expert witnesses
Two major Ethical problems of expert witnesses include the following
Economically Induced FavoritismConflict of interests.Economically Induced Favoritism as an ethical problem in the use of Expert witnesses refers to the act of favoring either the prosecution or the defense due to monetary inducements. this occurs when the expert witness receives monetary inducement in exchange for a narrative that suits the person paying him.
Conflict of Interests occurs when the interests of the expert witness aligns with the interest of either the prosecution or the defense and hence this alters the testimony of the expert witness in such a way that it favors one of the parties involved.
Cross examination affords either party the chance to critically question an expert witness based on what he/she has said or based on any conclusion drawn from their statements. The process of cross examination helps in identifying if an expert witness has been compromised.
learn more about Expert witness at https://brainly.com/question/28308170
#SPJ1
Camila is discussing pet peeves with her classmates. She says one of her biggest pet
peeves is when a person speaks with their mouth full of food. What would this be an
example of?
crime
folkway
more
law
One of her major pet peeves, according to her, is when someone speaks while having food in their mouth. This would be an example of folkway.
What is folkway?Folkway is the acquired behavior that a social group adopts and uses to give a customary way of acting. Folkways, according to the American sociologist William Graham Sumner who first used the phrase, are social customs that the group's members do not deem to be of moral importance (e.g., customary behaviour for use of the telephone). Similar to personal habits, the folkways of communities develop from the regular repeating of behaviors that successfully satiate fundamental human needs. These behaviors spread acceptance and become standard. Folkways exist because they are practical and mostly work on an unconscious level.
To learn more about folkway, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9044207
#SPJ13
During his lifetime, John executed a Last Will and Testament instituting his cousins, Abegail to inherit a portion equivalent to 1/4 of his entire estate and Ces to inherit a portion equivalent to 1/2 of the entire estate. As appearing on the will, it was the intention of John that only Abegail and Ces should inherit his whole estate. Ces, thereafter, filed a petition for probate inter-vivos for the allowance of John’s Will. During the petition, another cousine, Rica, opposed arguing that she should also be entitled to the estate of John considering that the disposition consist only of 3/4 portion leaving behind 1/4 portion vacant. Will the petition prosper?
Answer:
Explanation: Yes it will prosper
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
Derick has been working as a first responder since many years. His primary responsibility at a crime scene is to question witnesses and gather useful information from the scene. Which of these first responder career roles does Derick fit into?
The first responder career roles which Derick fit into is a: B. police officer.
What is a career field?A career field can be defined as a series of sequential and related occupations (jobs) that make use of similar skills, and they typically lead to the short and long-term career goals of an individual such as a police officer.
Who is a police officer?A police officer can be defined as an expert or professional who has been trained and licensed as a first responder to any issue that arises within the public space, especially by gathering intelligence, useful information, and question witnesses of an event.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that Derick fit into a police officer because he his primarily saddled with the responsibility of questioning witnesses and gather useful information from a crime scene.
Read more on police officer here: https://brainly.com/question/25781646
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Derick has been working as a first responder since many years. His primary responsibility at a crime scene is to question witnesses and gather
useful information from the scene. Which of these first responder career roles does Derick fit into?
OA paramedic
OB. police officer
Oc. fire truck driver
OD. firefighter
According to the article, what has restricted the power of the popular majority even more than the Framers likely intended?
Answer:he Tenth Amendment's simple language—“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”—emphasizes that the inclusion of a bill of rights does not change the fundamental character of the national government.
Explanation:
Which role does a president fulfill when pardoning
someone for a criminal offense?
O chief diplomat
O chief legislator
O chief executive
commander in chief
When a president pardons a person for a crime, they are acting in the capacity of chief executive.
What authority does forgiving have?A pardon is an act of clemency, mercy, and forgiveness. The idea of a pardon dates back to a time when an omnipotent king had the authority to punish or commute any punishment. In India, the Constitutional system includes the ability to grant pardons.
What does the executive's ability to grant pardons entail?Article 72 of the Indian Constitution grants the president the authority to pardon. In all circumstances when the punishment is for a violation of a law to which the executive power of the Union extends, it gives the President the authority to "grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment."
Learn more about chief executive: https://brainly.com/question/1402389
#SPJ13
Is it fair to reward loyalty by giving government appointments to friends? Explain.
It can be held as completely unfair and biased to reward the loyalty by giving government appointment to friends, however, the appointments that are in one's hands may be rewarded to the friends and families by the person in power.
What is the significance of a government appointment?Appointment of friends to a position under government employment when the person does not have enough skills and qualifications is completely unfair as a representation of the misuse of power of position.
However, it will be considered as truly and completely fair only when the appointment of the person is done when he or she is friend, but also highly competent for such appointment.
Therefore, the significance regarding government appointments has been aforementioned.
Learn more about government appointment here:
https://brainly.com/question/25669488
#SPJ1
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a what?.
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages mentioned to the money granted in a court case to a plaintiffs to compensate for damages or other sustained losses, such as injuries.
Civil damages are monetary reward granted when a person agonize a loss due to the illegitimate or inattentive actions of another party.
Compensatory damages are planned to compensate plaintiffs for the actual debts they have experienced.
Example of Contemporary damages, for a more wealthy extremity of society, the value of lost allowance will be much elevated than someone who is poor or retired.
To know more about plaintiffs refer to the link below
brainly.com/question/12177554
#SPJ1
In what ways has 9/11 changed U.S. domestic policy?
Answer:9/11 has changed the policy by showing the world that we need more protection in the world and now the world and airports are a lot more alert than they were years ago
Explanation:
The death of James Byrd Jr. helped refocus the national spotlight on hate crimes against minorities?
Responses
True
False
This assertion is accurate. The passing of James Byrd Jr. assisted in bringing hate crimes against minorities back into the public spotlight.
How did James Byrd Jr.'s death affect things?The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, often known as the Matthew Shepard Act, was passed by Congress in 2009 as a result of Byrd's lynching-by-dragging in Texas in 2001, which prompted the state of Texas to enact a hate crimes law.
What exactly does the James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act do?The proposal, which was developed in reaction to the 1998 killings of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr., broadens the scope of the 1969 federal hate-crime law in the United States to cover acts motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, se-xual orientation, gender identity, or disability.
Learn more about James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act: https://brainly.com/question/26111669
#SPJ13
I need help with this question but no one is helping me! Can someone please help me
The case of Pinkertons vs the U.S (1946) deals with the rule that the conspiracy and crime the conspirator agree to commit separate offenses.
What is conspiracy?A conspiracy, also known as a conspiracy, is a secret plan or agreement of persons (called conspirators) for an illegal or harmful purpose, such as murder or treason, especially politically motivated, to keep their agreement secret from the public or others. people affected by it. In political terms, a conspiracy refers to a group of people who have come together to usurp, change, or overthrow established political power. Depending on the circumstances, conspiracy can also be a felony or a civil offense The term usually refers to the offense or illegality of the perpetrators of the conspiracy, because people do not need a conspiracy to do actions that are legal and ethical or that no one would object to.
To learn more about conspiracy, refer;
https://brainly.com/question/14307903
#SPJ13
How can you be beneficial to others
Answer:
I think by helping them in what they love most
being there for them always as ur mom thus
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a what?.
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a class action lawsuit.
HOW DOES A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT WORK, AND WHAT IS IT?
A civil case known as a "class action" has at least one person or entity acting as a representative of the entire group of persons or business entities who have shared harm due to the defendant's actions. Although the disputes in a class action can differ, they are shared by all class members.Class actions may be filed in a federal or state court. The appropriate court to hear the case is the federal court if it involves federal statutes.To learn more about Class Action Lawsuits, follow the link https://brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ13
Jim crow laws, a set of racist and discriminatory rules and regulations against african americans, were enacted in the south starting in the mid- to late 1800s. In the south starting in the early 1800s nationwide starting in the mid- to late 1800s. Nationwide starting in the early 1800s.
State and local regulations known as the "Jim Crow laws" made racial segregation legal.
The laws, which were named after a Black minstrel show figure, were intended to marginalize African Americans by denying them the right to vote, hold jobs, receive an education, or have other possibilities. They were in place for about 100 years, from the post-Civil War era until 1968. Jim Crow laws frequently resulted in arrests, fines, jail terms, violence, and even death for anyone who tried to violate them.
Black codes were stringent local and state restrictions that outlined when, where, and how people who had formerly been in slavery might work, as well as how much they could be paid. The codes spread throughout the South as a legal means of enslaving Black people, removing their right to vote, controlling where they lived and traveled, and kidnapping children for labor.
The 13th Amendment, which ended slavery in the United States, was ratified in 1865, which is when the origins of Jim Crow legislation first appeared.
To learn more about Jim Crow laws from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/22549874
#SPJ4
Answer:
in the South starting in the mid- to late 1800s
Explanation:
edge 2023
Florida online traffic school section 2 review test
Suppose you wanted to know about how many total magazine subscriptions 200 elementary school students would sell during
the magazine drive. Which data measure would be most helpful?
A. Median
B. Truncated mean
C. Standard deviation
D. Arithmetic
The correct answer is option (D) Arithmetic.
Suppose you wanted to know about how many total magazine subscriptions 200 elementary school students would sell during
the magazine drives. Arithmetic data measure would be most helpful.
What is Arithmetic?The area of mathematics known as arithmetic is concerned with the study of numbers and various operations on them. The fundamental mathematical operations are addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. The symbols provided indicate these operations.
Addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are commonly regarded as the four basic mathematical operations.
Because the difference between two consecutive terms is always two, the sequence 3, 5, 7, and 9 is an example of arithmetic. Due to the fact that there is always a difference of minus five between consecutive terms, the sequence 21, 16, 11, 6,... is also arithmetic.
To learn more about arithmetic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11559160
#SPJ13
Which idea does this excerpt support?
the Anti-Federalist idea that dividing the government into branches will not stop abuses of power
the Federalist idea that lawmaking power should be divided among the different branches of government
the Anti-Federalist idea that lawmaking should be a matter for states, not the federal government
the Federalist idea that branches of government should overlap so they can check on each other’s activities
The correct option is B. The idea this excerpt support is the Federalist idea that lawmaking power should be divided among the different branches of government.
Why should there be a separation of power in the government?
The goal of the separation of powers is to prevent the accumulation of unrestrained power and to establish a system of checks and balances, whereby the authority of one body of government is constrained by that of another, preventing abuses of authority and a return to autocracy.
The U.S. Constitution established a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch from gaining undue power and divided the federal government's authority among these three branches in accordance with the doctrine of the separation of powers.
Thus, B is the right answer. This passage supports the Federalist view that the several parts of government should each have a portion of the legislative authority.
Learn more about separation of power here:
brainly.com/question/20630947
#SPJ2
P.s hopes this helps
Police agencies are often referred to as quasi-military organizations_
True
False
True. Police agencies are often referred to as quasi-military organizations.
Quasi-military organizations: what are they?The traditional quasi-military organizational structure for police departments is thought to be archaic in the twenty-first century. In order to give police officers more freedom to act as they see fit and not be unduly constrained by rules and orders given from above, some writers call for some kind of liberalization of the police organization.
It is believed that this could open the door for increased police work efficiency. In contrast, we will contend in this paper that the quasi-military type of organization is very important to preserve the spirit of the police job and many positive aspects of the culture associated with it.
The police system and culture of today undoubtedly have many drawbacks, but these must and can be resolved without altering the organization's fundamental structure.
Learn more about quasi-military organizations with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14819351
#SPJ13
A lay person may not testify about his opinion on a matter until he shows that he knows more than an
average person about the subject.
True
False
A lay witness may testify in the form of an opinion as long as the opinion is based on the witness’s personal knowledge and it is helpful to understanding the witness’s testimony or determining a fact in issue.
What is Lay Opinion?A lay witness may swear in the form of an idea as long as the opinion is based on the observer's personal experience and aids in comprehending the witness' testimony or establishing the fact in Lay opinion testimony is sometimes used to communicate a concise statement of fact in situations where it would be impractical to testify to all of the many observations and contemporaneous thoughts that went into the judgement. On some subjects, lay perspectives are usually acceptable.If the witness is not testifying as an expert, his testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those that are: (a) rationally based on the witness' perception and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.To learn more about lay person testify refer :
https://brainly.com/question/5828608
#SPJ13
2. How does corruption impact on service delivery? (125 words, 5 marks)
Corruption affects service delivery by instituting unethical attitudes and fraud that affect the quality of services and the use of resources for positive purposes, such as public service.
What is the impact of corruption on the public service?Corruption is a set of illegal and unethical attitudes for personal benefit or that of third parties. In the public service, corruption is capable of increasing social inequality and opportunities for the population.
Corruption can occur through the diversion of funds intended for the application of public policies to improve the population's quality of life, for example.
Therefore, corruption must be fought through the punitive application of a set of laws, so that social institutions and the public service maintain their suitability in society.
Find out more about corruption on:
https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
