which of the following is not true about Europe?

Answer:

visual imagery

Explanation:

The main idea of this passage is to tell you about how the federalist papers let to the ratification of the constitution.The passage said,Alexander Hamilton decided to produce a number of printed essays that would explain the need for such a new constitution.These essays are now referred to as the "Federalist Papers".This shows that the main idea is to tell you about the ratification of the constitution because the federalist papers played a part in the constitution. This also shows that Hamilton wrote this to explain a need for a new constitution.The passage said,"These essays were invaluable in educating the public of the true purpose and value of the new constitution....After six weeks, and against all odds, New York ratified the U.S. Constitution" This shows that the essays educated people about the need for the constitution to be ratified. This also shows that it made new york want to ratify the constitution so the constitution was ratified. To summarize, the main idea of this passage is to explain/tell you how the federalist papers led to the ratification of the constitution.

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation were not working largely because they did not grant enough power to the federal government. First of all, they were too weak to enforce laws, regulate trade routes, and especially levy taxes, which was very important coming out of the Revolutionary War with so much debt. All 13 states voted to redraft and edit the Articles, but instead of changing it, they started over with the Constitution.

Answer:

B. Occupying all of north america

Answer:

Similar to New England colonies, the Middle colonies also flourished in trade of major items like iron and furs. The middles colonies had rich farmland and a moderate climate. This made it a more suitable place to grow grain and livestock than New England. The Southern colonies had fertile farmlands which contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo.

The colonies were alike in that they all had close ties to England. They were mainly populated by English-speaking people. The Middle colonies and New England had some slaves, while the southern colonies had africans as most of the population.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

Explanation:

The author's voice in the text, based on the word choices she makes, scornful and sarcastic. Thus, option C is correct.

Sarcasm is the use of words that signify the opposite of what you really want to express, usually to insult someone, demonstrate displeasure, or just to be humorous. Scornful means to feel or show disdain or ridicule.

More significantly, numerous unemployed persons confront the bleak prospect of surviving. Many people are unemployed, and many more are working for minimal pay. Only a naïve optimist could dismiss the current grim reality. We cannot change the workforce merely by talking about it. We must rise to the occasion and effect genuine change.

The author's voice throughout the book is disdainful and sardonic, depending on the word choices she uses. As a result, option C is correct.

Learn more about sarcastic here:

https://brainly.com/question/27490742

#SPJ5

Your question was incomplete, probably the complete question was.....

More importantly, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence. A large number lack work, and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist could deny the dark realities of the moment. We cannot transform the workforce simply with talk. We must rise to this challenging occasion and make true change.

Answer:

A peasant is a pre-industrial agricultural laborer or a farmer with limited land-ownership, especially one living in the Middle Ages under feudalism and paying rent, tax, fees, or services to a landlord. In Europe, three classes of peasants existed: slave, serf, and free tenant...and no I wouldn't like to be a  peasant :c

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Why was the Ordinance of Nullification passed in 1832?

The national government passed it to prevent problems between the states.

The state of Virginia passed it in opposition of the Alien and Sedition Acts.

✔  The state of South Carolina passed it in opposition to the Tariff of 1828.

The state of Kentucky passed it to support of the Missouri Compromise.

The Ordinance of Nullification was passed in 1832 because the state of South Carolina passed it in opposition to the Tariff of 1828. The correct option is C.

South Carolina's Ordinance of Nullification declared the Tariffs of 1829 and 1832 unconstitutional and thus null and void. It was founded on Vice President John C. Calhoun's doctrine of nullification. This doctrine served as the foundation for Confederate political ideology.

South Carolina passed the Ordinance of Nullification in November 1832, declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state. In December, President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation asserting the federal government's supremacy.

Thus, the ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about the Ordinance of Nullification here:

https://brainly.com/question/4404190

#SPJ6

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Based on historical perspective, the thing that caused Britain to begin considering India's desire for independence is "The end of WW1."

Following the end of world war I in 1918, there were various lasting effects on the people, particularly the significant participating countries.

One of the significant political impacts of World War I was the rise of independence movements among many nations, including India.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option B. "The end of WW1."

Learn more about the impacts of world war I here: https://brainly.com/question/750915

Answer:

Cooperative defense against other groups of your species. Some primates form groups and defend valuable resources, such as fruit-trees, against groups of their own species.

Answer:

look at this

Explanation:

While training, samurai would use wooden weapons for practice against each other, then sharp swords against dummies made of wood or straw. Samurai also would often practice their weapon techniques against live slaves and prisoners.

Answer:

The ability to pay for it.

Explanation:

hope this helps <3

when Solomon's successor, Rehoboam, dealt tactlessly with economic complaints of the northern tribes, in about 930 BCE (there are differences of opinion as to the actual year:} ) the Kingdom of Israel and Judah split into two kingdoms: the northern Kingdom of Israel, which included the cities of Shechem and Samaria^^

after the death of King Solomon (sometime around 930 B.C.) the kingdom split into a northern kingdom, which retained the name Israel and a southern kingdom called Judah, so named after the tribe of Judah that dominated the kingdom. ......The last war they engaged in destroyed Israel but left Judah intact:)

Uh also the current nation of Israel is still largely made up of the original southern kingdom of Judah, while the tribes of the northern kingdom remain scattered: >

em... here are some random names :D Nine landed tribes formed the Northern Kingdom: the tribes of Reuben, Issachar, Zebulun, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Ephraim, and Manasseh

Answer:

Imperialism means to incite power by using diplomacy or military force. This was seen in The Spanish American War where the US fought Spain and ended gaining Puerto Rico, Guam and The Philippines.

Explanation:

D..hope this answer helps out

Answer:

As a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, Mason refused to sign the Constitution and lobbied against its ratification in his home state, believing the document as drafted gave too much power to a central government and was incomplete absent a bill of rights to guarantee individual liberty.

Many were not pleased with the document that was drafted. One of George Mason's objections was that he thought the Constitution did not adequately protect U.S. citizens without a Bill of Rights. Since no Bill of Rights was intended to be added before the document was ratified, he chose not to sign the Constitution.

hope this helps!!:)

Explanation:

Answer: exporting tobacco

Answer:

i thinks its a

Explanation:

all of the above

Answer:

Free will

Explanation:

Answer:

Having sharply honed writing skills can help you clearly and quickly communicate updates, events, projects, or other important topics to co-workers without requiring additional time for clarification or questions also Professional writing skills help your peers, colleagues or friends understand your message. In our world of social media posting, texting, email communications, blogs and beyond, good writing is essential to convey your points effectively.

Explanation:

For example uh  good writing skills inclue Grammar, punctuation, spelling, vocabulary, clarity, brevity, engagement, proofreading, revising. Professional Writing Skills. Note taking, letter writing, email writing, MS Office, business writing, written communication skills.And more i think-

Good writing skills have become crucial in today's job market because written communication is the primary mode of communication, effective communication is necessary for business operations, and good writing reflects attention to detail.

Good writing skills involve the ability to communicate ideas effectively through written language. This includes proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.

Additionally, good writing skills involve clarity and conciseness, the ability to convey ideas and information in an organized and logical manner, and the capacity to adapt the writing style to the intended audience and purpose of the writing. Good writing also demonstrates critical thinking, creativity, and attention to detail.

For example, in a marketing job, writing skills are essential for crafting compelling ad copy and email campaigns that attract and engage potential customers.

Learn more about effective communication here:

https://brainly.com/question/17392318

#SPJ3

Answer:The book clarifies the difference between actions that are merely wrong from those that are truly evil, discusses the problem of detecting evil, and describes the effects on the clinician of witnessing evil. The book also discusses what is known about the psychology of terrorism, and the question of whether a spiritual approach to evil is

Explanation:

Answer and Explanation:

As far as I'm aware, No the U.S. is not blamed for Haiti’s fate..

Answer:

whats the previous question? : /

Answer:

A-Holds national party conventions & run campaigns for their candidates to win

A-Host some rallies for their elections

B-Can take away votes from 2 major parties and offer another option for voters

C- Major parties tend to win over third parties which usually only gains a small percentage of votes

D-It ensures that a certain party wins before the election because of how districts are deliberately drawn. Gerrymandering eliminates any opposing electoral competition for the party in power.

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

Answer:

I think it's c It says that this needs to be 20 characters long so

Answer:

5

Explanation:

A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.

When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.

The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).

Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.

Hope this helps.

-Northstar

Answer:

Events Leading to the French and Indian War. The French and Indian War is part of an often-forgotten period in American history.It took place from 1754 to 1763—between the time the first European settlers arrived in North America and the time when some of their descendants fought for independence in the American Revolution (1775- 83). The French and Indian War