Why was the Hundred Years' War a cause of the Protestant Reformation?
A. It caused people to resent the victorious Catholic Church.
B. It brought fame and wealth to the Lutheran rebels.
C. It led people to identify themselves by nationality.
D. It wiped out more than 25 percent of Europe's population. PLEASE HELPP ASAPPP

Answer:

the answe is strong coffee

Explanation:

I hope dis helps

Answer:

b. enslavement

Answer:

John Locke is one of the most famous philosophers of the modern age. In his philosophy of society, Locke developed an alternative to Hobbes ’idea of ​​the natural state and argued in his own social contract theory that government can only be legitimate if it obtains the consent of those governed and protects the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. In the absence of such consent, citizens were entitled to rebellion.   His ideas had a major influence on the development of political philosophy and he is considered one of the most significant advocates of liberalism.

Answer:

D) Peninsula

Explanation:

 Jamestown was built on a peninsula beside a river they named the "James River," which served to isolate the settlement and deter potential invaders. All of the ships were able to navigate the river because of its depth.

They had to move from an island to a peninsula because there were too many bugs and not enough sources of fresh water.

A peninsula is like an island, but it is connected to the mainland for about a quarter of its length. The freshwater is all around the other 3/4 of the peninsula.

Answer:

i need the online newspaper thing- then i will answer- Yuki

Explanation:

cuz i can't answer without the newspaper- T^T

Answer:

As towns grew wealthier, town dwellers began to resent the lord's feudal rights and his demands for taxes. They felt they no longer needed the lord's protection—or his interference. ... Power gradually shifted from feudal lords to the rising class of merchants and craftspeople.

Explanation:

Answer:

(B) In many moralizing ballads, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment tacked onto a sensational account of crime and adultery

Explanation: Only (B) gives us some indication that people's motivations for buying the broadsides might have been something other than for the moralizing sentiments themselves.

The true statement regarding broadsides is "They were also known as Corantos". Option D is correct.

Broadsides were cheap single-sheet prints of one side only commonly used for:

Broadsides were never printed to last, they were meant to convey basic information at a very cheap publication price. For this reason, they were always single-sheet prints, therefore option A is incorrect.

The first paper published in the American Colonies was a newspaper, printed on both sides, and was therefore not a broadside. This along with the fact that these prints were either printed locally or imported from England, tell us that options B and C are also false

Broadsides were published well before the 1800s in the American Colonies and the independent United States of America, one example is the Dunlap broadside that provided coverage of the Independence of the nation. This means that option E is also incorrect, leaving the correct option as D , before being known as broadsides, similar prints were known globally as Corantos.

To learn more visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5016722?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

British Parliament passed the Stamp Act to help replenish their finances after the costly Seven Years' War with France.

Explanation:

British passed the Stamp Act in 1765 which also helped the British soldiers stranded in the Seven Year's War to help with their financial conditions. The Colonists did not like the idea of the stamp act which was hugely asking for taxes from them. Hence, the above statement is appropriate.

Stamp Act was one of the most dangerous of the Acts which surpassed the ways and means by which the British Colonialists had started to collect taxes. The collection of taxes by precarious means was being imposed.

Taxes were being imposed on various, means likewise on the things such as papers of every variety, almanacs, pamphlets, and also loads of other resources on which the British masters had put on the taxes.

These taxes or the Stamp Act were also levied on the daily usage of papers. The Stamp Act was not being taken positively by the colonialists and hence, led to the American Revolution later on. It was a burden that was being put upon the Colonists.

Learn more about the Stamp Act of 1765 here:

https://brainly.com/question/8498165

#SPJ2

Answer:

Rough Riders

Explanation:

The most famous of all the units fighting in Cuba, the "Rough Riders" was the name given to the First U.S. Volunteer Cavalry under the leadership of Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt resigned his position as Assistant Secretary of the Navy in May 1898 to join the volunteer cavalry.

Answer: the Church became the great feudal player in the economic system of Europe. This was a system that, while virtually enslaving huge masses of people, made the Church very rich and very powerful ― both politically and militarily.

Explanation:

the Church became the great feudal player in the economic system of Europe. This was a system that, while virtually enslaving huge masses of people, made the Church very rich and very powerful ― both politically and militarily.

Answer:

legislation/executive bills

Explanation:

Other Greek cities set up democracies, most following the Athenian model, but none are as well documented as Athens' democracy. Athens practiced a political system of legislation and executive bills.

Answer:

Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.  

In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.

Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.  

Though Lincoln saw himself as working alongside the abolitionists on behalf of a common anti-slavery cause, he did not count himself among them. Only with emancipation, and with his support of the eventual 13th Amendment, would Lincoln finally win over the most committed abolitionists.

Explanation:

Sorry it so long

Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution,

Lincoln denied he was a radical. He said that he supported the Fugitive Slave Law and opposed any interference with slavery in the states where it already existed. He also said that he was not in favor "of bringing about the social and political equality of the white and black races."

Learn more about Abraham Lincoln here: brainly.com/question/759330

#SPJ2

Answer:

the answer is absolute location

Explanation:

since it has both latitude and longitude, it gives a precise(absolute) coordinate

Answer: to increase public support for the war.

Explanation:

I took this quiz a couple years ago~

Answer:

to increse public support of the war

Answer:

Some basic effects of Europeans coming to North America are that the Native Americans caught new diseases which included smallpox, influenza, measles, and chickenpox. Explorers used superior firepower, like single-shot muskets, to conquer natives.

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Colonization ruptured many ecosystems, bringing in new organisms while eliminating others. The Europeans brought many diseases with them that decimated Native American populations. Colonists and Native Americans alike looked to new plants as possible medicinal resources.

Answer:

Racial, Gender, Religious Inequality

Explanation:

It's pretty self explanatory. After George Floyd died, the whole country went rampant and started protesting for the police to be arrested. However, this has been going on for centuries. Now since the Coronavirus outbreak, people are being racist towards Asian people, calling it the "China Virus" or the "Chinese Virus"

Gender Inequality because of Men trying to get rid of Planned Parenthood and abortions, despite them not having a vagina or uterus to tell women what to do with their bodies.

Religous Inequality because Muslims are still called terrorists on the daily for simply walking into the store. Also because most religious people don't like Christians because of most of their beliefs when it comes to Homosexuals and members of the LGBTQ+ Community.

Answer:

The westward expansion of America into Native American territory lead to tension between the Indians and Americans. ... The removal of Native peoples from their land to reservations and the destruction of their livelihood was a main contributing factor to the many battles that made up the Indian Wars.

Explanation:

INFORMATION:

The war in the east was a struggle against British rule, while the war in the west was an "Indian War". The newly proclaimed United States competed with the British for control of the territory east of the Mississippi River. Some Indians sided with the British, as they hoped to reduce American settlement and expansion.

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation created a confederation, a government of ... was not an executive or judicial branch of government under the Articles. ... and Balances - Each branch checks the powers of the other two branches.

Explanation:

i looked it up

Answer:the answer is Sumer

Explanation:

I took the test

Answer:

I would say yes.

Explanation:

this is a matter of opinion, but I think yes. my reasoning is that the basis it was written on was that of a different time, so some things are as applicable now as they were back then. while some things are still relevant, others have become obsolete. so we might not need to start from scratch with a completely new constitution, in some peoples opinions, but it's hard to deny that we need to edit some parts of it to make it more relevant in this day and age.

Answer:

Babylonians used the Cuneiform system of writing. They borrowed it from the Sumerians and used it for government and religious purposes. For government purposes they used Akkadian and for religious purposes they used Sumerian.

Explanation:

Hopefully this helped, if not HMU and I will get u a better answer.

-Have a great day! :)

Answer:The terror that is gripping Americans due to the coronavirus would be familiar to America’s founding generation. As Noah Webster, then the editor of New York City’s first daily newspaper, wrote to a friend in the fall of 1793, “The melancholy accounts received from you and others of the progress of a fatal disease…excite commiseration in every breast. An alarm is spread over the country.”

The disease was the yellow fever, a virus that attacked the liver and kidneys. This American plague, which got its name because its victims became jaundiced, swept through the nation’s biggest cities a few times between 1793 to 1798. The first outbreak occurred in August of 1793 in Philadelphia, which served as the nation’s capitol from 1790 to 1800. By the middle of that November, the yellow fever would decimate the city, wiping out 5,000 of its 50,000 residents and forcing President Washington and his cabinet to flee to neighboring Germantown. Cool fall temperatures then suddenly stopped this wave of the disease, which, as scientists would determine a century later, was transmitted by mosquitos.

About two years later, New York City was hit particularly hard. Its first recorded patient was Thomas Foster, who sought medical attention from Dr. Malachi Treat, the health officer at the city’s port, on July 6, 1795. As a colleague of Dr. Treat later wrote, Foster’s yellow skin was “covered with purple spots, his mind deranged, his tongue covered with a dry back sordes.” Foster died three days later, and Treat himself was soon gone. By mid-August, two New Yorkers a day were dying, and all afflicted patients were quarantined at Bellevue Hospital. As Webster’s New York neighbor, Dr. Elihu Smith, noted in his diary in September, “The whole city, is in a violent state of alarm on account of the fever. It is the subject of every conversation, at every hour, and in every company.” By late November when this outbreak petered out, 730 New Yorkers had died—the equivalent of about 200,000 today, as the city then had a population of about 40,000

That fall, Webster, who is best known to us today for his monumental dictionary of American English published in 1828, sprang into action. In late October, he published a circular in his paper, The American Minerva, addressed to the physicians in the cities most affected by the fever over the past three years—Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore, Norfolk and New Haven—which asked them to pass on whatever information that they had gathered from their own practices.

This circular served as the basis for the world’s first scientific survey. As Webster argued, given that “we want evidence of facts,” medical professionals needed to work together to understand this public health problem. About a year later, Webster published his findings in a 250-page book, A Collection of Papers on the Subject of the Bilious Fevers, prevalent in the United States for a Few Years Past, which featured eight chapters authored by experts scattered across the country such as Dr. Elihu Smith. Unfortunately, their accounts were short of hard data. Noting that poor immigrants constituted a large percentage of the dead, Smith, hypothesized that “the sudden intermingling of people of various and discordant habits [was] a circumstance favoring the production of the disease.” In contrast, Webster assumed that the cause had something to do with urban grime, arguing that Americans should “pay a double regard to the duties of order, temperance and cleanliness.” But given his empirical leanings, Webster acknowledged that he still needed to gather more data to reach a definitive conclusion.

Partisanship was as pervasive then as it is now, and Webster’s political opponents ridiculed his efforts. Webster’s paper supported the Federalist party of President Washington and Benjamin Franklin Bache, a grandson of Benjamin Franklin, who edited Philadelphia’s Republican paper, attacked his counterpart for self-serving behavior, writing that Webster merely sought for himself “the honor and the glory to triumph over a malady.” In a cruel irony, just three years later, Bache died from the disease at the age of twenty-nine.

Answer:

The terror that is gripping Americans due to the coronavirus would be familiar to America’s founding generation. As Noah Webster, then the editor of New York City’s first daily newspaper, wrote to a friend in the fall of 1793, “The melancholy accounts received from you and others of the progress of a fatal disease…excite commiseration in every breast. An alarm is spread over the country.”The disease was the yellow fever, a virus that attacked the liver and kidneys. This American plague, which got its name because its victims became jaundiced, swept through the nation’s biggest cities a few times between 1793 to 1798. The first outbreak occurred in August of 1793 in Philadelphia, which served as the nation’s capitol from 1790 to 1800. By the middle of that November, the yellow fever would decimate the city, wiping out 5,000 of its 50,000 residents and forcing President Washington and his cabinet to flee to neighboring Germantown. Cool fall temperatures then suddenly stopped this wave of the disease, which, as scientists would determine a century later, was transmitted by mosquitos.About two years later, New York City was hit particularly hard. Its first recorded patient was Thomas Foster, who sought medical attention from Dr. Malachi Treat, the health officer at the city’s port, on July 6, 1795. As a colleague of Dr. Treat later wrote, Foster’s yellow skin was “covered with purple spots, his mind deranged, his tongue covered with a dry back sordes.” Foster died three days later, and Treat himself was soon gone. By mid-August, two New Yorkers a day were dying, and all afflicted patients were quarantined at Bellevue Hospital. As Webster’s New York neighbor, Dr. Elihu Smith, noted in his diary in September, “The whole city, is in a violent state of alarm on account of the fever. It is the subject of every conversation, at every hour, and in every company.” By late November when this outbreak petered out, 730 New Yorkers had died—the equivalent of about 200,000 today, as the city then had a population of about 40,000.That fall, Webster, who is best known to us today for his monumental dictionary of American English published in 1828, sprang into action. In late October, he published a circular in his paper, The American Minerva, addressed to the physicians in the cities most affected by the fever over the past three years—Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore, Norfolk and New Haven—which asked them to pass on whatever information that they had gathered from their own practices.This circular served as the basis for the world’s first scientific survey. As Webster argued, given that “we want evidence of facts,” medical professionals needed to work together to understand this public health problem. About a year later, Webster published his findings in a 250-page book, A Collection of Papers on the Subject of the Bilious Fevers, prevalent in the United States for a Few Years Past, which featured eight chapters authored by experts scattered across the country such as Dr. Elihu Smith. Unfortunately, their accounts were short of hard data. Noting that poor immigrants constituted a large percentage of the dead, Smith, hypothesized that “the sudden intermingling of people of various and discordant habits [was] a circumstance favoring the production of the disease.” In contrast, Webster assumed that the cause had something to do with urban grime, arguing that Americans should “pay a double regard to the duties of order, temperance and cleanliness.” But given his empirical leanings, Webster acknowledged that he still needed to gather more data to reach a definitive conclusion.Partisanship was as pervasive then as it is now, and Webster’s political opponents ridiculed his efforts. Webster’s paper supported the Federalist party of President Washington and Benjamin Franklin Bache, a grandson of Benjamin Franklin, who edited Philadelphia’s Republican paper, attacked his counterpart for self-serving behavior, writing that Webster merely sought for himself “the honor and the glory to triumph over a malady.” In a cruel irony, just three years later, Bache died from the disease at the age of twenty-nine.

Answer:

Sure, what is it

Explanation:

Answer:

1st: sight and touch

2nd: it informs readers about climate and culture

Explanation:

just took it on a test and it was correct!!

Answer:

C. Foreshadowing

Answer:

Foreshadowing

Explanation:

edge 2020