Here, in the given excerpt it discusses about that part of the U.S Constitution which is known as the Supremacy Clause. This gives us an understanding that the Florida constitution cannot overrule anything that is in the U.S. Constitution.
What do you mean by Supremacy Clause?The supremacy Clause relates to Article VI, Paragraph found in the constitution of the United States of America. This clause rightly established that the federal laws and federal Constitution and take precedence over the laws of the states and the states' constitutions.
The states were also prohibited from interfering with exercise of constitutional powers by the federal government of the country.
Therefore, the correct statement is Option C that is the Florida constitution cannot overrule anything that is in the U.S. Constitution.
Learn more about Supremacy Clause:
https://brainly.com/question/1481445
#SPJ1
The following people have been arrested and charged with a variety of crimes. For each case, decide whether the person should be released and, if so, under what conditions: (1) bail (release after a certain amount of money is paid; set an amount), (2) personal recognizance (release with no money), (3) conditional release (release under certain conditions; set the conditions), or (4) pretrial detention (no release).
Name: Marta Garcia
Age: 26
Charge: Possession of crack cocaine
Residence: 619 30th Street; lives alone; no family or references.
Employment: Unemployed
Education: 11th grade
Criminal record: As a juvenile, five arrests, mostly misdemeanors. As an adult, two arrests for petty larceny and a conviction for possession of dangerous drugs. Probation was successfully completed.
Comment: Arrested while leaving a train station with a large quantity of crack cocaine. Urine test indicates use of narcotics.
Answer:
4
Explanation:
Because she a certified criminal
What are some possible negative issues with the M'Naghter Rule? Select all that apply.
- Fails to distinguish between violent defendants and one that no longer pose a danger to society.
- Anyone who said they did not realize an action was wrong could use insanity plea.
- Fails to differentiate between mental illness that are temporary or lifelong conditions.
- Made it difficult to determine a defendants' thought process at time of crime.
Answer:
A. Fails to distinguish between violent defendants and one that no longer pose a danger to society.
C. Fails to differentiate between mental illness that are temporary or lifelong conditions.
Explanation:
M'Naghten Rule is an insanity defense used by defendant's attorney to plead defendant not guilty of crime due to mental conditions suffered during the time crime committed.
M'Naghten Rule states that a defendant will be pleaded not guilty only under conditions when it will be proved that the mental condition of defendant was not right at the time when crime was committed and that he/she was not able to discern his/her actions as right or wrong.
The criticism received to the M'Naghten rule is that it fails to distinguish between defendants who pose threat to the society and those who do not pose threat any longer. Another criticism is that it fails to distinguish between mental illness that are temporary or conditions which are lifelong.
Therefore, option A and C are correct.