If her mother has legal custody and can provide consent. If your love and feelings are genuine, you will be together for no more than a year until she turns 18. This is by no means a justification for marriage.
What is child custody?The legal and practical relationship between a parent or guardian and a child in their care is referred to as child custody in the context of guardianship. Legal custody—the authority to make decisions regarding the kid—and physical custody—the obligation to house, feed, and otherwise look after the child—are both parts of child custody. Legal and physical custody of children are typically shared by married parents. Common legal actions involving child custody decisions include divorce, annulment, separation, adoption, and parental death. Most jurisdictions base child custody decisions on what is in the child's best interests.
To learn more about child custody, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28282860
#SPJ13
Jim crow laws, a set of racist and discriminatory rules and regulations against african americans, were enacted in the south starting in the mid- to late 1800s. In the south starting in the early 1800s nationwide starting in the mid- to late 1800s. Nationwide starting in the early 1800s.
State and local regulations known as the "Jim Crow laws" made racial segregation legal.
The laws, which were named after a Black minstrel show figure, were intended to marginalize African Americans by denying them the right to vote, hold jobs, receive an education, or have other possibilities. They were in place for about 100 years, from the post-Civil War era until 1968. Jim Crow laws frequently resulted in arrests, fines, jail terms, violence, and even death for anyone who tried to violate them.
Black codes were stringent local and state restrictions that outlined when, where, and how people who had formerly been in slavery might work, as well as how much they could be paid. The codes spread throughout the South as a legal means of enslaving Black people, removing their right to vote, controlling where they lived and traveled, and kidnapping children for labor.
The 13th Amendment, which ended slavery in the United States, was ratified in 1865, which is when the origins of Jim Crow legislation first appeared.
To learn more about Jim Crow laws from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/22549874
#SPJ4
Answer:
in the South starting in the mid- to late 1800s
Explanation:
edge 2023
A lay person may not testify about his opinion on a matter until he shows that he knows more than an
average person about the subject.
True
False
A lay witness may testify in the form of an opinion as long as the opinion is based on the witness’s personal knowledge and it is helpful to understanding the witness’s testimony or determining a fact in issue.
What is Lay Opinion?A lay witness may swear in the form of an idea as long as the opinion is based on the observer's personal experience and aids in comprehending the witness' testimony or establishing the fact in Lay opinion testimony is sometimes used to communicate a concise statement of fact in situations where it would be impractical to testify to all of the many observations and contemporaneous thoughts that went into the judgement. On some subjects, lay perspectives are usually acceptable.If the witness is not testifying as an expert, his testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those that are: (a) rationally based on the witness' perception and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.To learn more about lay person testify refer :
https://brainly.com/question/5828608
#SPJ13
Derick has been working as a first responder since many years. His primary responsibility at a crime scene is to question witnesses and gather useful information from the scene. Which of these first responder career roles does Derick fit into?
The first responder career roles which Derick fit into is a: B. police officer.
What is a career field?A career field can be defined as a series of sequential and related occupations (jobs) that make use of similar skills, and they typically lead to the short and long-term career goals of an individual such as a police officer.
Who is a police officer?A police officer can be defined as an expert or professional who has been trained and licensed as a first responder to any issue that arises within the public space, especially by gathering intelligence, useful information, and question witnesses of an event.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that Derick fit into a police officer because he his primarily saddled with the responsibility of questioning witnesses and gather useful information from a crime scene.
Read more on police officer here: https://brainly.com/question/25781646
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Derick has been working as a first responder since many years. His primary responsibility at a crime scene is to question witnesses and gather
useful information from the scene. Which of these first responder career roles does Derick fit into?
OA paramedic
OB. police officer
Oc. fire truck driver
OD. firefighter
Which would be an example of primary deviance?
O a pickpocket who just stole his first car
O a usually calm football player who hits another player in a moment of anger
O a seasoned con-artist who tricks an elderly lady into investing her savings
O a drug user who also begins to deal drugs
Answer:
A usually calm football player who hits another player in a moment of anger
Explanation:
I came here looking for the answer but that's what makes sense. The rest are examples of secondary deviance due to their history. This football player is usually calm, therefore it is primary deviance.
what is the formal investigation prior to trial in which the defense uses various methods to obtain information from the prosecution to prepare for trial?
Answer:
Explanation:0000000000000000000000000
Explain how common law was imposed on the commonwealth countries.
The way that Common Law was imposed on Commonwealth Countries was that the Commonwealth Countries were under the control of the British who used common law.
Why do Commonwealth Countries use common law?Commonwealth countries are those countries who were once ruled by, or colonized by the English/ British. These nations were made to abide by the laws of the British as the British functioned as their effective government.
As a result of this, the Commonwealth countries gained a foundation in Common Law, which was the law being used by the English/ British.
Find out more on Common Law at https://brainly.com/question/8068423
#SPJ1
I need help with this question but no one is helping me! Can someone please help me
The case of Pinkertons vs the U.S (1946) deals with the rule that the conspiracy and crime the conspirator agree to commit separate offenses.
What is conspiracy?A conspiracy, also known as a conspiracy, is a secret plan or agreement of persons (called conspirators) for an illegal or harmful purpose, such as murder or treason, especially politically motivated, to keep their agreement secret from the public or others. people affected by it. In political terms, a conspiracy refers to a group of people who have come together to usurp, change, or overthrow established political power. Depending on the circumstances, conspiracy can also be a felony or a civil offense The term usually refers to the offense or illegality of the perpetrators of the conspiracy, because people do not need a conspiracy to do actions that are legal and ethical or that no one would object to.
To learn more about conspiracy, refer;
https://brainly.com/question/14307903
#SPJ13
Which role does a president fulfill when pardoning
someone for a criminal offense?
O chief diplomat
O chief legislator
O chief executive
commander in chief
When a president pardons a person for a crime, they are acting in the capacity of chief executive.
What authority does forgiving have?A pardon is an act of clemency, mercy, and forgiveness. The idea of a pardon dates back to a time when an omnipotent king had the authority to punish or commute any punishment. In India, the Constitutional system includes the ability to grant pardons.
What does the executive's ability to grant pardons entail?Article 72 of the Indian Constitution grants the president the authority to pardon. In all circumstances when the punishment is for a violation of a law to which the executive power of the Union extends, it gives the President the authority to "grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment."
Learn more about chief executive: https://brainly.com/question/1402389
#SPJ13
What is one of the major roles district courts play in the federal judiciary?
2. How does corruption impact on service delivery? (125 words, 5 marks)
Corruption affects service delivery by instituting unethical attitudes and fraud that affect the quality of services and the use of resources for positive purposes, such as public service.
What is the impact of corruption on the public service?Corruption is a set of illegal and unethical attitudes for personal benefit or that of third parties. In the public service, corruption is capable of increasing social inequality and opportunities for the population.
Corruption can occur through the diversion of funds intended for the application of public policies to improve the population's quality of life, for example.
Therefore, corruption must be fought through the punitive application of a set of laws, so that social institutions and the public service maintain their suitability in society.
Find out more about corruption on:
https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
According to the article, what has restricted the power of the popular majority even more than the Framers likely intended?
Answer:he Tenth Amendment's simple language—“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”—emphasizes that the inclusion of a bill of rights does not change the fundamental character of the national government.
Explanation:
HELP! ASAP. Make 10 laws (Must be appropriate) for a space colony.
Space law refers to the body of laws which govern space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles.
What are Space Colony Laws.Space colony laws includes those laws that help guard against the unacceptable practices in space exploration. They may include the following;
Laws on space exploration, Laws on liability for damageLaws on weapons useLaws on rescue effortsLaws on environmental preservationLaws on information sharingLaws on new technologiesLaws on sovereignty in spaceSpace intellectual property lawSpace criminal lawThese laws just like laws which are obtainable on the planet are necessary in maintaining orderliness in Space. Since no country can lay claim to jurisdiction in space, these international space laws are enforced by countries who engage in space exploration.
Learn more about Space exploration at https://brainly.com/question/27325845
#SPJ1
Slavery and ___________ go hand in hand according to the author.
A. Moving the planet further from the sun
B. None of these is correct
C. Environmental and ecological destruction
D. Improving environmental conditions through replanting of trees and burning coal
E. Raising the poor out of poverty
Slavery and raising the poor out of poverty go hand in hand according to the author.
Slavery is said to be a condition in which one human being was owned by another as a slave. Where a slave was considered by law as a property, or a chattel, and was thus deprived of most of the rights which were ordinarily held by free persons.
Slavery can be a factor within the poor communities where certain poor people themselves enslave other poorer people, by using prejudice as a justification. Thus, once caught in a contemporary form of slavery people are unlikely to be able to break out of the cycle of poverty.
Hence, option E is correct.
To learn more about slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/9030828
#SPJ1
In what ways might press reports and
news coverage creates problems for the
the criminal justice system and be damaging
to the objective outcome of a criminal
trial?
The media primarily sets the agenda in two ways: first, by reporting the news, and second, by advising us on how to interpret it.
What significance does news coverage have?
News is that aspect of communication that informs us about the evolving events, problems, and people in the outside world. The main purpose of news is to inform the public, even though it may also be engaging or entertaining.
What effects does news have on people and society?
Positive effect: People can keep up with global events with the help of 24-hour news channels. News organizations support democracy by promoting governmental transparency. Currently, many in positions of authority are terrified of news outlets because they are answering questions from the public on their behalf.
Learn more about news here:
https://brainly.com/question/26027924
#SPJ13
Prepaid cell phone services can protect privacy. One can buy a phone for cash and pay cash in advance for service. There are no billing records, and records of calls made on the phone are not linked to the owner. Cell phone carriers and governments in a few countries considered ending prepaid phone services because criminals use it; law enforcement agencies could not trace them. Should the decision about whether to provide prepaid cell phone service be left to the service providers or should government ban it? If left to the companies what policy do you think they should adopt?
Based on the Prepaid cell phone services
Prepaid billing should be established by cell phone carriers for each service. It should be against the law to purchase phones without billing and without providing the required documentation.Data should be supplied to government organizations on a regular basis so they may monitor for potential risks.This is further explained below.
What are Prepaid cell phone services?Generally, Since there are no billing records and no communications required, prepaid services may safeguard privacy.
As a result, it might pose a hazard since terrorists could utilize them to their advantage and they wouldn't be as easily traceable. Therefore, steps to bolster national security were required.
Now that prepaid services are prohibited, it will be extremely difficult for many individuals to pay cash every time they require a service, which would cause a lot of issues for the populace.
Since these technological advancements, individuals mostly choose prepaid services because it seems to save them time and effort.
Therefore, rather than forbidding, the government may implement certain crucial regulations that would improve security.
Several possible policies include:
I) Prepaid billing should be established by cell phone carriers for each service.
II) It should be against the law to purchase phones without billing and without providing the required documentation.
III) Data should be supplied to government organizations on a regular basis so they may monitor for potential risks.
Read more about Prepaid cell phone services
https://brainly.com/question/15852125
#SPJ1
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a what?.
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages mentioned to the money granted in a court case to a plaintiffs to compensate for damages or other sustained losses, such as injuries.
Civil damages are monetary reward granted when a person agonize a loss due to the illegitimate or inattentive actions of another party.
Compensatory damages are planned to compensate plaintiffs for the actual debts they have experienced.
Example of Contemporary damages, for a more wealthy extremity of society, the value of lost allowance will be much elevated than someone who is poor or retired.
To know more about plaintiffs refer to the link below
brainly.com/question/12177554
#SPJ1
Economic interest groups include all of the following EXCEPT this:
Economic interest groups include all of the aforementioned except this: a. consumer groups.
What is an interest group?An interest group simply refers to a group that comprises individuals who are only concerned about influencing various policies of the government based on their interests, common aims, cause, goals, or people they represent.
In the United States of America, some examples of interest groups include the following:
Professional associations.UnionsThe National Rifle Association.Environmental interest groups.Agricultural interest groups.The National Organization for Women.CorporationsPublic action committees.In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that consumer groups are not classified as economic interest groups because they are only focused on issues affecting consumers such as bad products.
Read more on interest groups here: brainly.com/question/15936960
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Economic interest groups include all of the following EXCEPT this:
a. consumer groups
b. unions
c. professional associations
d. corporations
e. agricultural interest groups
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
On Tuesday Aria tells Bu, a workmate, that she is: ‘thinking of selling her car which is worth about £2,000’. On Wednesday morning Bu emails Aria: ‘Will take the car for £2,000, will pay U when I see U’. Aria replies by email on Wednesday evening: ‘Don’t be silly, I was not actually offering to sell the car but, having thought about it, you can have it for £2,500. I know you will want it so don’t bother writing back unless you are not interested.’ Bu is so annoyed when he reads the first sentence of Aria’s email that he immediately deletes it. On Saturday Aria drives round to Bu’s house to deliver the car and demands payment. Discuss.
Would your answer differ if, after reading all of the email Aria sent on Wednesday evening, Bu decided he wanted to buy the car for £2,500 and Aria now refuses to deliver it?
There is no valid agreement between Bu and Aria in the situation given above, as there was no common acceptance for the purpose of buying and selling the car at the desired price.
What is the significance of a valid agreement?A valid agreement can be referred to or considered as an agreement that holds the conditions of offer being accepted by the parties involved, and eventually leads to the formation of a legal contract between both the parties involved in the contract for one single offer.
Therefore, the significance regarding a valid agreement has been aforementioned.
Learn more about a valid agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/28080427
#SPJ1
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Slavery has been shown to have what impact on the environment?
A. reduce carbon emissions and reduce global warming
B. increase global warming and injure the populations of endangered species
C. None of these is correct
D. improve conservation efforts and replenish endangered species
B. increase global warming and injure the populations of endangered species
illegal deforestation speeds up the levels of carbon dioxide
How does the population of animals respond to global warming?
Due to changes that result in less food, less successful reproduction, and interference with the environment for local wildlife, rising temperatures reduce the survival rates of many species. Our National Capital Area parks already show the effects of these negative developments.
claimed that specifically, the world's forests are frequently cleared using slave labor. According to him, woods store these gases and absorb them from the atmosphere, which is why such rapid, illegal deforestation speeds up the levels of carbon dioxide.
to learn more about slavery refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/782305
#SPJ13
In Chapter 9 we learned about how and when the death penalty can be applied. Do you believe the United States should outlaw the death penalty? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
I believe that the death penalty should be prohibited in the United States because it is a sentence that does not repair the victims of a crime and instead benefits the accused. Additionally, it can be dangerous for some innocent people who are accused of crimes they did not commit.
What is the death penalty?The death penalty is a term that refers to a method of execution of a person who has been sentenced by the State, as punishment for committing a crime established by law. The crimes for which this penalty is usually applied are called capital crimes.
Should the death penalty be banned in the United States?The death penalty should be banned in the United States because it is an ineffective way to sentence a criminal. In the first place, this method does not repair the victims of the crime or their relatives. On the other hand, this form of execution benefits the condemned in a certain way because it frees him from the punishment of remaining in jail.
Therefore, we believe that this practice should be prohibited. Additionally, this practice is dangerous because sometimes some individuals who were innocent were sentenced to death and after their execution their innocence was proven.
Learn more about death penalty in: https://brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ1
Identify and describe different personal values that influenced what happed in the Texas v White
The different personal values that influenced what happened in the Texas v White is that, Texas v. White, where states did not have the right to unilaterally secede from the United States.
Texas v. White was considered to be a case which was argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869. This case thus involved a claim by the Reconstruction government of that Texas, that United States bonds owned by Texas which were almost since 1850 had been illegally sold by the Confederate state legislatur, which was during the American Civil War.
Here, states were not given the right to unilaterally secede from the United States. As it was held that the United States is considered to be an indestructible union from which no state can secede.
Hence, Texas v. White was a significant case in the American Supreme Court's history.
To learn more about the Texas v. White here:
https://brainly.com/question/18789720
#SPJ1
Expert witnesses are paid for their testimony by either the prosecution or the defense. In your opinion, what ethical problems, if any, does this common practice raise? What role does cross-examination play in limiting any potential problems with partisan expert witnesses?
An expert witness most suitable found in countries with common law such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States, is a person whose opinion by virtue of education, training, certification, skills or experience, is accepted by the judge as an expert.
Below you can read more about Ethical problems of expert witnesses.
Ethical problems of expert witnesses
Two major Ethical problems of expert witnesses include the following
Economically Induced FavoritismConflict of interests.Economically Induced Favoritism as an ethical problem in the use of Expert witnesses refers to the act of favoring either the prosecution or the defense due to monetary inducements. this occurs when the expert witness receives monetary inducement in exchange for a narrative that suits the person paying him.
Conflict of Interests occurs when the interests of the expert witness aligns with the interest of either the prosecution or the defense and hence this alters the testimony of the expert witness in such a way that it favors one of the parties involved.
Cross examination affords either party the chance to critically question an expert witness based on what he/she has said or based on any conclusion drawn from their statements. The process of cross examination helps in identifying if an expert witness has been compromised.
learn more about Expert witness at https://brainly.com/question/28308170
#SPJ1
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?.
The supporters of the 2019 Texas law that banned straight-ticket voting stated that it would boost voter understanding.
All judicial offices in Texas are currently elected on a partisan basis. For interim court vacancies, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county leaders and confirmation by the Senate. According to the Texas constitution, district and appellate judges are chosen by public vote. Unless the candidate passes a severe independent campaign criterion, only a judicial candidate who has been proclaimed the victor of a party primary is permitted to compete on the official ballot in the general election.Thus this is what Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas made argument in support of the law.
Learn more about Texas Law here: https://brainly.com/question/28996037
#SPJ4
you run a local marathon, and it is very crowded. as you approach the first mile marker, you accidentally trip one of the other runners. she falls hard, hits her head on the pavement, and is taken away in an ambulance. she later sues you for negligence. what do you think would happen if you defend the lawsuit by saying that you did not intend to trip her?
The legislative branch of the federal government, Congress, is responsible for passing laws across the country.
When does federal law take precedence over state law? Pick two options for the answer?
When two laws conflict, when Congress officially or tacitly declares that one law supersedes the other, or when federal laws are so ubiquitous that they encompass the entire legal landscape, federal law preempts state law.
Which division of the government drafts statutes?
Every branch of government makes a particular kind of law. The legislative branch creates statutory law, which lays forth the public policy objectives that the elected legislators desire to achieve. Statutes frequently offer broad guidelines for how the executive branch should carry out statutory laws (public policy).
To learn more about federal law from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/25912245
#SPJ4
Quiz Question 6.7
Homework Unanswered
There are two main worries with the following reasoning. What are they?
"New York state's roadways are a death trap; there were 966 traffic related deaths in 2015 alone.
Wyoming is a lot safer with only 190 such deaths in the same year!"
The two main worries are number of deaths from the accident and the number of accidents taking place in New York.
What causes road accidents?Other factors that contribute to deadly traffic accidents include driving in the wrong lane, making illegal turns or risky lane changes, having a defective car, tailgating and overtaking when it is not necessary, and running stop signs and red lights.
Without a question, distracted driving is the main factor in auto accidents. A distracted driver is not fully focused on the road; instead, they may be more preoccupied with passengers, a mobile device, or even a cheeseburger.
According to study, following too closely behind oncoming traffic increases the risk of an accident more than speeding does. If you drive too slowly, other drivers may have to brake and accelerate frequently to keep up with you. It might result in confusion, annoy other motorists, and perhaps an accident.
To learn more about road accidents visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1235714
#SPJ13
When you read information on the Internet, you must _____
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a what?.
A civil case where many plaintiffs come together to seek a remedy for the damages they have incurred is called a class action lawsuit.
HOW DOES A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT WORK, AND WHAT IS IT?
A civil case known as a "class action" has at least one person or entity acting as a representative of the entire group of persons or business entities who have shared harm due to the defendant's actions. Although the disputes in a class action can differ, they are shared by all class members.Class actions may be filed in a federal or state court. The appropriate court to hear the case is the federal court if it involves federal statutes.To learn more about Class Action Lawsuits, follow the link https://brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ13
Is it fair to reward loyalty by giving government appointments to friends? Explain.
It can be held as completely unfair and biased to reward the loyalty by giving government appointment to friends, however, the appointments that are in one's hands may be rewarded to the friends and families by the person in power.
What is the significance of a government appointment?Appointment of friends to a position under government employment when the person does not have enough skills and qualifications is completely unfair as a representation of the misuse of power of position.
However, it will be considered as truly and completely fair only when the appointment of the person is done when he or she is friend, but also highly competent for such appointment.
Therefore, the significance regarding government appointments has been aforementioned.
Learn more about government appointment here:
https://brainly.com/question/25669488
#SPJ1
