I’ll mark brainlist

Answer:

hi

Explanation:

Answer:

hii

Explanation:

Answer:

1.18 million legal immigrants (618k new arrivals, 565k status adjustments)

Explanation:

Answer:  Lincoln's only mission was to keep the Union together. The Manifest Destiny is a success expansion, The united State achieve territory expansion.

Answer:

rmenians occupied important posts within the Ottoman Empire, Artin Dadyan Pasha, who served as minister of foreign affairs from 1876 to 1901, is one of many ..

Explanation:

Answer:

If its bad enough calling someone or the cops or to walk away from the fight if there is one

Explanation:

calling the cops would keep you and anyone else involved from getting hurt or in deep trouble. Walking away could stop the fight or let them cool off and helps yourself cool off

Answer:

Gladiators

Explanation:

In hunger games,  the story revolve around a group of people who were told to fight to the death in order to represent their district. It's all only for the amusement of the elites.

Their fate is similar to Italian Gladiators. most of them were slaves captured by the Roman soldiers. They were told that they might obtain their freedom if they fight each other for the amusement of the nobles.

The used of chariot was created to signify the similarities between the two condition.

Answer:Nationalism and revolution have generally been held to go together. Many nation‐states have had their origins in revolution, from the Americans in the 18th century to a host of Third World nation‐states in the 20th century. Generally, both modern revolutions and modern nationalism have the same origins, in 18th century Enlightenment thought. But this paper argues that, despite this common origin, the principles of revolution and nationalism are divergent, and can set one against the other. Revolutions emphasise freedom and equality; nationalism emphasises integration and unification. These principles can clash, though not inevitably and not always. The paper examines the 1789 French Revolution, the 1848 revolutions and the 1917 Russian revolution. It shows that in the first two cases, revolutionary aspirations came up against and were eventually displaced by nationalist aims. In the case of 1917, revolution paradoxically, and unintentionally, institutionalised nationalism. These examples show that, though linked at some high level of modern thought, revolution and nationalism express different and at times divergent strands of modernity.

Explanation:

Answer:

i think this is the answer i really tried my best so here we go        

answer: Free religious exercise, First Amendment

Explanation:

Answer:

The Schlieffen Plan, was a battle plan first suggested by Alfred, Graf von Schlieffen, chief of the German general staff, in 1905. The plan was intended to allow Germany to fight an effective two-front war. Before and during its execution in World War I, the strategy was extensively changed by Schlieffen's successor, Helmuth von Moltke. Moltke's modifications, which included a reduction in the size of the attacking army, were blamed for the inability of Germany to achieve a quick victory

Answer:

The Treaty of Versailles was the formal peace treaty that ended World War I between the Allies and Germany, their main enemy during the war. Senate Majority Leader Henry Cabot Lodge, a Republican from Massachusetts, opposed the treaty, specifically the section regarding the League of Nations.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The Mexica (Aztec) people relied on markets to move goods between growers and consumers. They had a massive empire, so it's no surprise that their main market was colossal too.

Answer:

Secretary of Treasury

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Correct answer is Secretary of Treasury.

Explanation:

First option is correct as Hamilton was the Secretary of Treasure between 1789 and 1795 and was the first Secretary of Treasure in US.

His plan led to the creation of strong union. He even advocated the creation of National Bank.

Second option is not correct, as he was never Secretary of Defense.

Answer: Civilization refers to both a process and a destination. It describes the process of a social collective becoming civilized, or progressing from a state of nature, savagery, or barbarism to a state of civilization. It describes a state of human society marked by significant urbanization, social and professional stratification, the luxury of leisure time, and corresponding advancements in the arts and sciences. The capacity for reasonably complex sociopolitical organization and self-government according to prevailing standards has long been thought of as a central requirement of civilization.

There is widespread greement in the Western world that civilization is a good thing, or at least that it is better than the alternatives: barbarism, savagery, or a state of nature of some sort. In theory, as time passes and the further we get away from the Big Bang and the primordial soup, the more we progress both as a species and as individual human beings; the more we progress, the more civilized we become individually and collectively; the more civilized we become, the further we are removed from the vestiges of savagery and barbarism. In fact, for many in the West civilization, progress, and modernity are by definition good things (e.g., Stark 2014). Samuel Huntington has summarized the state of debate rather succinctly: to be civilized is good, and to be uncivilized is bad (1998, 40).

As with so many debates, however, rarely are things so clearly black or white; there are usually many more shades of gray. For instance, in stark contrast to the rosy picture of civilization and modernity suggested above, Zygmunt Bauman (2001, 4, 6) has alarmingly highlighted the dark side, suggesting that the Holocaust was not so much “a temporary suspension of the civilizational grip in which human behaviour is normally held” but a “‘paradigm’ of modern civilization” and modernity. This is not necessarily to suggest that civilization is “bad” or not worth having or being a part of; it is just to highlight that along with the upsides there are some potential downsides, even a “dark side” (Alexander 2013).

To enable a better understanding of the various perspectives on civilization, this article begins by outlining what civilization means, particularly in the history of Western political thought (for other traditions of thought see, for example, Weismann 2014). It then examines the significance and nature of the rather symbiotic relationship between civilization and concepts such as progress and modernity. The article then explores some of the potential consequences that go along with or are outcomes of the pursuit of these ideals, the less commonly acknowledged darker side of civilization. Included here are other important dimensions of the relationship between civilization and progress, such as the relationship between civilization and war and the exploitative nature of the relationship between civilization and the environment or the natural world more generally. The conclusion proposes a slightly different way of thinking about civilization that might help us avoid some of the pitfalls that lead away from the light and into darkness.

Explanation: no it’s not ok!

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.

Answer:

A. Email and phone calls

Explanation:

Answer:

I think 13. is D and 14. is C

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Mycenaean

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Mycenaean !

The New York City draft riots were against drafting because of the racial backlash against the Emancipation Proclamation.

Answer:

The New York Draft Riots occurred in July 1863, when the anger of working-class New Yorkers over a new federal draft law during the Civil War sparked five days of some of the bloodiest and most destructive rioting in U.S. history.

hope this helps!!:)

Explanation:

Answer:

Pearl Harbor speech refers to the defense of the national sovereignty of the United States, the Declaration of Sentiments is a symbol of the struggle of women and is considered as the founding text of feminism as a social movement.

Explanation:

Answer:

C. It will split and segregate society.

Explanation:

Answer:

D. Willam B. Travis

Explanation:

Mark brainliest pls

Answer:

18th of April hope it helps

Answer:

hope it helps...

Explanation:

The country gained official independence as Zimbabwe on 18 April 1980. The government held independence celebrations in Rufaro stadium in Salisbury, the capital.

Answer:

James Thornwell, a preacher and a religious write, and Albert Barnes, who was American theologian.

Answer:

C. It encouraged colonists to question authority.

Answer:C

Explanation:

Answer:

They probably had many resources that in Italy they did not have such as precious stone and/or gold

Explanation:

Answer:

The aim of invading Ethiopia was to boost Italian national prestige, which was wounded by Ethiopia's defeat of Italian forces at the Battle of Adowa in the nineteenth century (1896), which saved Ethiopia from Italian colonisation.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. a peaceful way to solve disputes

Explanation:

Answer:

you travel on the turnpike to avoid traffic and get to your end destination quickly

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

What will happen to the equilibrium price and quantity for soybeans is that the price will accordingly increase to fit the demand.

If soybeans currently sell at a price of $3/lb, this price will be altered by the article published by the New England Journal of Medicine. The article refers to the cardiovascular benefits of eating soy in every meal. People would be motivated to include soy in every meal as part of their daily diet. This will affect the demand because the supply is limited. The consequence, a considerable rise in the soybean price due to the excess demand.