Performance of a duty you are obligated to do under the law is not good consideration. this is known as the pre-existing duty rule.
A precept under settlement regulation that states that if a party to a contract is below a pre-existing responsibility to carry out, then no consideration is given for any amendment of the agreement and the amendment is consequently voidable.
Preexisting duty rule is a not unusual-law rule of agreement. It says that the rule of thumb that overall performance of an act by using which a celebration is already contractually sure to carry out does not represent legitimate consideration for a new promise.
The legal obligation rule does no longer practice if the parties mutually agree to alternate the terms of the settlement. As an instance, the owner of a house and contractor may want to conform to include a new window at an additional cost of $one thousand. instead, the events should agree not to perform part of the contract for a $500 reduction inside the price.
Learn more about pre-existing here : https://brainly.com/question/13811062
#SPJ4
Which factor contributed to the growth of the U.S. economy during the 20th
century?
A. The United States cut off trade with foreign countries.
B. The United States decided to remain on the gold standard.
C. The U.S. economy changed its focus back to agriculture.
OD. The United States increased international trade.
The United States increased international trade factor contributed to the growth of the U.S. economy during the 20th century. A factor is a specific kind of trader who engages in factorage, or receiving and selling products on compensation.
A mercantile fiduciary who does business in his own name without exposing his principal is referred to as a trade factor. One characteristic of the economy stocks that factor investors select is the value factor. The value factor is predicated on the idea that stocks outperform more costly ones when compared to some measure of underlying value. When international variations in factor endowment are the driving force behind commerce.
To learn more about trade, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1900868
#SPJ1
help me with this please
It is safe to assume that slavery would have persisted or taken a longer time to end if the court had declined to overturn the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson during its decision in the brown v board of education.
What was the outcome of the case between Brown v. Board of Education?In the aforementioned case, the Supreme Court declared that racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Constitution.
The "separate but equal" rule established in the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling in 1896 was subsequently overturned.
With this decision, racial segregation in American schools came to an end.
What if the court in Gideon v. Wainwright had maintained Florida's law?If the court had upheld Florida's statute in the Gideon v. Wainwright case, it would have set a precedent for other cases, and many people would have ended up in jail because they would not have been able to afford an attorney to defend them in court.
Why didn't Florida assign Gideon a counsel?Because counsel could only be provided for a poor person accused with a deadly offense under Florida law, the trial judge rejected Gideon's request for a court-appointed attorney.
Why was Gideon's petition denied by the Florida Supreme Court?The trial judge denied Gideon's motion because Florida law only allowed the appointment of counsel for poor people facing capital charges.
Gideon, however, actually sent that letter; the court looked into his case; he was retried with the aid of an accomplished defense attorney; he was found not guilty; and after serving a two-year term for a crime he didn't commit, he was released from prison.
Due to the majority ruling in favor of Gideon by the Supreme Court in 1963, criminal defendants in federal and state courts now have the right to legal representation. following the decision.
Learn more about brown v board of education: https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ13
Question 4 of 20
Which of the following is an example of primary source?
O A. Law journal
O B. Legal encyclopedia
O C. Legal analysis
OD. Case law
Answer: O A. Law Journal
Explanation:
4. How does the plaintiff, Mrs. Wood, try to implicate the gun manufacturer (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced
What are your thoughts on the ted bundy case? do you agree with the decision of killing him? What are your thoughts on Miranda v Arizona?
Answer: I agree because he killed people so there for he should be put to death
Explanation:
the fbi has estimated that over a five-year period, alf and elf have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the united states, which have resulted in damages that exceeded:
The FBI has estimated that over a five-year period, ALF and ELF have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the united states, which have resulted in damages that exceeded: 110 MILLION DOLLARS.
The FBI categorizes the terrorist threat the United States faces into two main groups: domestic and foreign. In order to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, for the advancement of political or social goals, may use unlawful force or threaten to use unlawful force against persons or property.
The terrorist threat has undergone significant modifications during the previous ten years. Right-wing extremism replaced left-wing terrorism as the most serious domestic terrorist threat to the nation. Special interest extremism, as typified by the Animal Liberation Front- ALF and the Earth Liberation Front- ELF, has become a significant terrorist danger over the past few years. According to the FBI, the ALF/ELF have committed 600 or more crimes in the US since 1996, causing losses of more than 110 million dollars.
To learn more about terrorist click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15203676
#SPJ4
greg is arrested at a warehouse in brady bunch corporate park. a government prosecutor provides evidence before a grand jury against greg for receiving stolen property. the grand jury formally charges greg. this charge is a(n)
An administration examiner gives proof before a stupendous jury against Greg for getting taken property. The stupendous jury officially charges Greg. This charge is abuses Greg's considerable fair treatment privileges data.
What is a meaningful fair treatment right?
Meaningful fair treatment is a rule in US sacred regulation that permits courts to lay out and shield specific major freedoms from government impedance, regardless of whether procedural securities are available or the privileges are unenumerated (not explicitly referenced) somewhere else in the U.S. Constitution.
What central freedoms are safeguarded by considerable fair treatment?
The High Court has decided that the freedoms to "Individual independence, substantial uprightness, self-pride, and self-assurance" are safeguarded by the Fair treatment Proviso. Together, these interests are conjured to legitimize an intrinsically safeguarded right to protection.
Learn more about Greg here:
https://brainly.com/question/28654863
#SPJ4
During which of the following decades in American history was the crime rate
relatively stable?
The 1950s
The 1960s
The 1970s
The 1980s
Answer:
The 1950s
Explanation:
Following World War II, the crime rate in America remained relatively stable until the 1960s, when reported criminal activity increased dramatically.
Which of the following is an example of demonstrative evidence?
O Gun
O Fingerprint
O Handwritten note
O Model of crime scene
Answer:
D: model of the crime scene.
Explanation:
Demonstrative evidence is evidence that is not the original piece of evidence.
if correct, please mark me Brainiest.
bp violated the clean air act by discharging pollutants from one of its refineries and was unable to reach a settlement with the epa regarding a violation of the law. the epa plans to go forward with a trial on this matter, which will be heard by:
Administrative law judge (ALJ). The EPA intends to proceed with this case's trial, which will be presided over by an administrative law judge (ALJ).
- About the Clean air act :
- In order to correct violations of the Clean Air Act at its petroleum storage facility in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, TotalEnergies Marketing Puerto Rico Corp. will put in place compliance measures estimated to cost $1.3 million, according to a recent announcement from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As part of the settlement, the company's oil storage facility in Guaynabo must take steps to address major issues and poor maintenance. A civil fine of $500,000 will also be paid by the business.
- When the company was alerted by EPA that its gasoline storage operation resulted in vapor concentrations high enough to pose unacceptable fire and explosion hazards, it failed to act appropriately and EPA issued a Clean Air Act emergency order to the company in 2019. The corporation has already addressed the immediate risks that its site presents.
- Before continuing to use some tanks, the corporation is required under the settlement to repair any problematic parts and enhance monitoring. Tank vapor concentrations increase to a certain point. This involves performing safety tests, repairing or operating alterations to the tanks, or taking the tanks out of service. The settlement calls for reporting to EPA as well as additional improvement measures.
To know more about the Clean Air Act, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/2375762?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
how could a forensic ipse dixit statute potentially take away the defendant's constitutional rights in a courtroom if not for the melendez-diaz v. massachusetts (2009) decision?
It can take away by not allowing the lack of cross-examination of the forensic analyst
The government is relieved of its burden of proof by the forensic ipse dixit statutes, which also deny defendants the right to confrontation. Additionally, these laws encourage negligence and fraud in crime laboratories, inhibit robust defense advocacy, and raise the possibility of erroneous convictions and penalties. It is not a ridiculous quirk of Texas law that this forensic ipse dixit statute exists.
This forensic ipse dixit statute has been adopted by almost all of the states in the union. In the great majority of American jurisdictions, live testimony is not required to substantiate forensic claims; instead, the state may rely on a forensic certificate. If not for the Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009) ruling the forensic analyst would not be cross-examined, resulting in negligent practice and increased rates of false convictions, a forensic ipse dixit statute may potentially take away the defendant's constitutional rights in a trial.
Read more about cross-examination on:
https://brainly.com/question/28523666
#SPJ4
What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at work? Explain and
analyze why this story speaks to her point?
Lou tells the story of her son, Jamal, who was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit. She explains how the judicial system failed him at every turn, from the police officers who beat him during interrogation to the prosecutor who withheld evidence that would have exonerated him. This story speaks to Lou's point because it illustrates how the judicial system can fail even when there is overwhelming evidence of innocence. In Jamal's case, the police officers who beat him during interrogation likely caused him to confess to a crime he did not commit. The prosecutor then withheld evidence that would have exonerated him, which led to his wrongful conviction. This story highlights the need for reform in the judicial system, as innocent people like Jamal should not be punished for crimes they did not commit.
What is wrong with the legal system in the United States?
Drug usage and mental health problems are a couple of the problems causing the high incarceration rate. Spending on community preventive and treatment initiatives would be preferable to funding for policing and detentions. If inmates were once again eligible for federal Pell Grants, recidivism might also be decreased.To learn more about the judicial system, follow the link https://brainly.com/question/1145536
#SPJ13
what is the difference between rule of law and rule of man
Answer:
Absence of rule of law implies the absence of a legislature judiciary and a legal administrative and enforcement system. On the other hand rule of man is associated with the lack of a legal system that is lawlessness.
Select the correct answer.
Which is an example of a chemical change?
A.
freezing water
OB.
boiling water
C.
baking a cake
OD. felling a tree
OE. breaking a glass pane
Answer:
Burning, cooking, rusting and rotting are examples of chemical changes. Therefore your answer should be C. baking a cake
Explanation:
hope this helps you! <3
How much total interest will Molly pay using this plan?
Answer:
1: I am sure that this is a mathematics question, not a law question.
2: How are people supposed provide an answer without even knowing what the plan Molly is using?
Explanation:
g while jason is inside the bank, he accidentally shoots a security guard who is chasing him. james drives the getaway car and remains outside the bank the whole time. he did not know that jason had brought a gun or that the security guard had been shot. what is james liable for?
Criminal responsibility is the legal term for when someone can be charged with breaking the law.
What does it mean to have criminal liability?Criminal responsibility is the legal term for when someone can be charged with breaking the law. Criminal culpability involves both prospective and actual blame, which implies that a defendant may face charges and a sentence regardless of whether they are shown to have committed a crime or not.The behavior that results in the victim's death constitutes the criminal act element necessary for murder. The distinction between murder and manslaughter is made by the criminal intent component of murder. The three varieties of malice aforethought are depraved heart, intent to kill, and purpose to cause significant bodily harm.Felony-murder. The Model Penal Code opposes the use of the death sentence for homicides that take place during theTo learn more about Criminal Liability refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29246755
#SPJ4
The Small Business Administration provides entrepreneurs with helpful information about planning, starting, and running a business.
Choose the answer.
A.True
B.False
The statement is The Small Business Administration provides entrepreneurs with helpful information about planning, starting, and running a business is True.
What is The Small Business Administration?The Small Business Administration is an agency whose roles and responsibilities to rendered assistance to small scale business owners by providing them with the necessary information they need to know as well as the information that will enables the business owners to succeed in their respective business choice.
This agency support entrepreneur in all ways and they as well help to boost the economy of a country due to important roles they play.
Therefore we can conclude that statement is true.
Learn more about The Small Business Administration here: https://brainly.com/question/13424073
#SPJ1
hijackers of a truck carrying dog food were arrested and indicted by a grand jury. during the grand jury's investigation. the district attorney's office subpoenaed the truck driver as a witness. to her relief, she was not asked questions about a series of thefts of shipments of dog chew toys that she was involved in, but believes that the subject might be brought up at trial by the defense lawyers. she is afraid that she likely will be fired if she invokes the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination on the witness stand, so she wants to avoid testifying at all at the trial, even if she is subpoenaed by the defense. as her lawyer, what advice should you give her about complying with a subpoena?
She cannot refuse to testify since she is permitted to invoke the Fifth Amendment while testifying.
With the exception of situations involving members of the armed forces, no one may be tried for a capital offense or other infamous crime without a grand jury's presentment or indictment or the militia who are serving in actual combat or other times of public danger; no one may be twice put in danger of losing their life or limb for the same offense; no one may be forced to testify against themselves in a criminal case; and no one may be deprived of their life, liberty, or property.A number of rights important to both criminal and civil judicial processes are established by the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment forbids "double jeopardy" in criminal proceedings, guarantees the right to a grand jury, and protects against self-incrimination. The "life, liberty, or property" of a citizen must also be preserved by "due process of law," and the government must compensate when removing private property for public use.Thus this is the meaning of Fifth Amendment.
Refer here to learn more about Fifth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/1332952
#SPJ4
How do checks and balances AND the Bill of Rights ensure that the United States government would remain relevant throughout the history of the United States?
The chain is what keeps the process going.
One branch has the power to carry out an action, while another branch has the responsibility of making sure this power isn't abused.
The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of the constitution. These amendments still greatly affect how citizens of the U.S. can live.
Both checks and balances and Bill of Rights maintain the power of the U.S. government, providing reason to why it is still relevant after all these years.
Two neighbors have a conflict over the boundary between their properties. Both are talking to their own attorneys, but they wish to settle without involving anyone else. Which method of dispute resolution will they use?
A. Court action
B. Negotiation
C. Mediation
D. Arbitration
Two neighbors have a conflict over the boundary between their properties. Both are talking to their own attorneys, but they wish to settle without involving anyone else. They will use Negotiation method of dispute resolution.
Any kind of communication, whether direct or indirect, in which people with divergent interests debate potential collaborative actions to manage and ultimately settle their conflict is referred to as negotiation. Negotiations can be used to establish a future relationship between two or more parties or to fix an issue that has already arisen. Depending on the situation and the negotiating team's objectives, an attorney's role will change during a negotiation.
None of the parties to a voluntary negotiation are required to participate. The parties are free to accept or reject the results of the negotiations and to halt the procedure at any time. Parties have the option of taking part in the negotiations personally or choosing to have a third party, such as a relative, friend, attorney, or other professional, represent them.
Learn more about Conflicts here:
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ1
You are to present the financial statements in slide form for use with a multimedia projector. Identify one type of software that you may use to display the statements
A type of software that you may use to display these statements is Microsoft PowerPoint.
What is PowerPoint?PowerPoint can be defined as a software application or program that is designed and developed by Microsoft Inc., so as to avail all of its end users an ability to create and display various slides containing both a textual (statements) and multimedia information which can be used during a presentation.
Additionally, some of the features that are available on Microsoft PowerPoint include the following:
Custom slideshowsAnimation effectsNarrationsTransition effectsFormatting options.In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that Microsoft PowerPoint is a type of software that you may use to display the financial statements in slide form for use with a multimedia projector.
Read more on PowerPoint here: https://brainly.com/question/28220859
#SPJ1
c. if the prosecuting attorney does not exercise the right to a peremptory challenge of a judge, and if the defense is limited to at most two such challenges, how many challenges should the defense attorney make if he or she is 60 percent certain that the client is guilty?
A random variable is a numerical representation of the result of an experiment in statistics. Any qualities, quantity, or number that can be gauged or tallied qualifies as a variable.
What is the definition of a random variable?
A random variable is a variable with an unknown value or a function that gives values to each of the results of an experiment. There are two types of random variables: discrete (having specified values) and continuous (any value in a continuous range).
What are some examples of random variables?
Every event in an experiment has a probability, which ranges from 0 to 1, and the total probability of the experiment is 1. The number of outcomes from rolling a die, the number of outcomes from pulling a jack of spades from a deck of cards, and other examples are examples of discrete random variables.
To learn more about random variables from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/17217746
#SPJ4
An oral contract for $300 item is enforceable
True or false
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
If both parties agree to the contract, they both have to keep their end of the deal.
Pls mark brainliest
It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.
Can you enforce a verbal contract?As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.
Is an oral agreement still binding?A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.
Learn more about oral contract: https://brainly.com/question/15104947
#SPJ13
what is the main idea of amendment 1
Answer:
freedom of speech. that every individual has the right to a voice and opinion
Explanation:
Discuss the role of legal profession in development of law in Kenya
Legal profession of people such as lawmakers and judiciaries is the most important that led to the development of law and legal bodies in the Kenyan society.
What is the significance of a legal profession?A legal profession can be referred to or considered as the profession that deals in carrying and practicing activities related to laws and regulations of a particular society.
Lawmakers and members of the judiciary are the legal professionals who help in the development of laws in the countries and societies like they have in Kenya.
Therefore, the significance regarding a legal profession has been aforementioned.
Learn more about a legal profession here:
https://brainly.com/question/14477784
#SPJ1
What type of evidence can be pulled from both a computer and a portable device?
O images
O Text history
O GPS coordinates
O Phone call data
Answer:
images
Explanation:
an individual who is injured as result of a tort may bring a legal action against the person who caused the injury. in a court of law, the injured party is known as the
the injured party is known as plaintiff.
What is plaintiff and tort law ?
Plaintiff is the person who initiates a legal case against someone in court.
A tort is a civil wrong that exposes the perpetrator to legal responsibility and results in loss or injury to the claimant. Criminal law, which deals with crimes that the state has the power to punish, can be compared with tort law. Tort law strives to recompense those who suffer injury as a result of the conduct of others, in contrast to criminal law, which seeks to punish people who commit crimes. In nations with distinct civil and criminal legal systems, some wrongdoings like assault and battery can lead to both a civil complaint and a criminal prosecution.
to learn more about tort law click :
https://brainly.com/question/9966122
#SPJ4
a person who had been convicted of a felony 10 years ago was turned down for license. if he still desired a license, what is his next course of action?
His next course of action is Request a hearing before the Administrative Hearing Commission.
What is hearing?
A hearing refers to any formal proceeding before a court. The term usually refers to a brief court session that resolves a specific question before a full court trial takes place, or to such specialized proceedings as administrative hearings.
What is the purpose of hearing?
A hearing is a meeting or session of a Senate, House, joint, or special committee of Congress, usually open to the public, to obtain information and opinions on proposed legislation, conduct an investigation, or evaluate/oversee the activities of a government department or the implementation of a Federal law.
To learn more about hearing from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/5000833
#SPJ4
Describe the use of fingerprints in a police investigation, from collecting prints at the crime scene to presenting it as evidence in a trial.
How do you think a legal positivist would justify compulsory schooling?
I think a legal positivist would defend mandatory education as a way for children to properly grow their brains and understand the fundamentals of right and wrong. Additionally, it would instil in them the discipline needed to manage their time well, which will be crucial for their careers.
What do legal positivists believe in?Legal positivism is a legal philosophy that places an emphasis on how socially produced law is and how conventional it is. Legal positivism holds that law is synonymous with positive norms, i.e., norms created by legislators or regarded as common law or case law.
What is the legal principles of positivist school of thought?One of the most influential philosophical theories of the nature of law, legal positivism is characterised by two central tenets: (1) social facts—such as information about human behaviour and intentions—solely determine the existence and content of law; and (2) there is no inescapable link between morality and the law.
To learn more about legal positivist visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3521592
#SPJ13
